Originally posted by FatLazyContractor
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
So boys have you ever got your wallet out before getting your chap out?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostOf a male population of 31 million, the smarta$$ researchers surveyed 6108 men. That in itself is enough to call this study a complete waste of time.Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.Comment
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostDo you not know how statistics workComment
-
-
Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostOk, then explain the math behind this study.Comment
-
Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostOk, then explain the math behind this study.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostYou were the one saying it is dodgy, so why don't you prove why - without using words like "obviously" or hand waving "the sample is too small" answers. Statistics provides ways to analyse how good or bad a sample size is so please educate us.
As far as your expert suggestion of not using "The sample is too small", you have answered it yourself. And what if the statistical sample provide the exact opposite result? I am sure you will jump boat, given your analysis.Comment
-
Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostOf a male population of 31 million, the smarta$$ researchers surveyed 6108 men. That in itself is enough to call this study a complete waste of time.Comment
-
Originally posted by Pondlife View PostBy my basic back of the condom packet maths that works out to a quickie every other day plus a cheeky extra on his birthday and at christmas.
[I meant to quote this, not 'like' it, but that's not to say I don't like it]Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Today 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Yesterday 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Yesterday 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
Comment