Originally posted by FatLazyContractor
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
So boys have you ever got your wallet out before getting your chap out?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostOf a male population of 31 million, the smarta$$ researchers surveyed 6108 men. That in itself is enough to call this study a complete waste of time.Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.Comment
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostDo you not know how statistics workComment
-
-
Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostOk, then explain the math behind this study.Comment
-
Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostOk, then explain the math behind this study.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostYou were the one saying it is dodgy, so why don't you prove why - without using words like "obviously" or hand waving "the sample is too small" answers. Statistics provides ways to analyse how good or bad a sample size is so please educate us.
As far as your expert suggestion of not using "The sample is too small", you have answered it yourself. And what if the statistical sample provide the exact opposite result? I am sure you will jump boat, given your analysis.Comment
-
Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostOf a male population of 31 million, the smarta$$ researchers surveyed 6108 men. That in itself is enough to call this study a complete waste of time.Comment
-
Originally posted by Pondlife View PostBy my basic back of the condom packet maths that works out to a quickie every other day plus a cheeky extra on his birthday and at christmas.
[I meant to quote this, not 'like' it, but that's not to say I don't like it]Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Comment