Originally posted by FatLazyContractor
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
So boys have you ever got your wallet out before getting your chap out?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Do you not know how statistics workOriginally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostOf a male population of 31 million, the smarta$$ researchers surveyed 6108 men. That in itself is enough to call this study a complete waste of time.
Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.Comment
-
Ok, then explain the math behind this study.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostDo you not know how statistics work
Comment
-
-
As long as the sample is random, then all is fine.Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostOk, then explain the math behind this study.Comment
-
You were the one saying it is dodgy, so why don't you prove why - without using words like "obviously" or hand waving "the sample is too small" answers. Statistics provides ways to analyse how good or bad a sample size is so please educate us.Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostOk, then explain the math behind this study.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Then I suggest you read my first post.Originally posted by d000hg View PostYou were the one saying it is dodgy, so why don't you prove why - without using words like "obviously" or hand waving "the sample is too small" answers. Statistics provides ways to analyse how good or bad a sample size is so please educate us.
As far as your expert suggestion of not using "The sample is too small", you have answered it yourself. And what if the statistical sample provide the exact opposite result? I am sure you will jump boat, given your analysis.Comment
-
Why does the sample size make the study a complete waste of time?Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostOf a male population of 31 million, the smarta$$ researchers surveyed 6108 men. That in itself is enough to call this study a complete waste of time.Comment
-
I'd say he got his money's worth then.Originally posted by Pondlife View PostBy my basic back of the condom packet maths that works out to a quickie every other day plus a cheeky extra on his birthday and at christmas.
[I meant to quote this, not 'like' it, but that's not to say I don't like it]Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment