• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Leaked letter reveals Wonga thought it was worth £15bn

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    People would adjust if you couldn't get mortgages or buy fresh pineapples, that doesn't mean there aren't markets for them.

    Speaking of mortgages, super-high rate very short-term loans are often used here aren't they (bridging loans)?
    The problem with the payday loan market are the eye watering rates and the carefully planned escalation of the debt.

    Friend of mine had a partner die on her, she was in a bad way financially and the mortgage and loan providers rip her off at the worst time, it was sad to watch.

    If providers wan't to service the weak & vulnerable they need to be monitored effectively.

    I doubt the loan sharks have disappeared they just have legal competition.
    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
      I vaguely remember that now, and won't argue your point in that sense. To be fair, I do also see how it's the kind of service that will attract vulnerable (or just stupid) people. But at the same time I can see it as a legitimate service that people may need from time to time - and such a service couldn't exist at normal APR levels. Especially as doing business with poor people is more expensive.
      Actually, I'm meeting you half way - I do see the need for emergency short-term loans (with the appropriate APR).

      It's the business model of targeting the vulnerable who don't have the means to pay it back that I object to.
      "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
      - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by cojak View Post
        Actually, I'm meeting you half way - I do see the need for emergency short-term loans (with the appropriate APR).

        It's the business model of targeting the vulnerable who don't have the means to pay it back that I object to.
        That I'll agree to (although I'd prefer other ways to deal with it than legislation).

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by vetran View Post
          If the risk is so high that you need 4000% APR then I suspect the risk isn't worth doing.
          if it wasn't worth doing then they wouldn't be valuing themselves at 15 billion!

          Comment


            #15
            It's not 4000% just because of risk, but because otherwise the interest over such a tiny timeframe is negligible. It makes more sense to think of it as a fee than interest - in fact it probably makes more sense to price it that way with penalty fees. Or maybe that's what they DO do, but are required by law to present an equivalent APR and that's where it ends up looking so crazy?
            Originally posted by MaryPoppins
            I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
            Originally posted by vetran
            Urine is quite nourishing

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by d000hg View Post
              It's not 4000% just because of risk, but because otherwise the interest over such a tiny timeframe is negligible. It makes more sense to think of it as a fee than interest - in fact it probably makes more sense to price it that way with penalty fees. Or maybe that's what they DO do, but are required by law to present an equivalent APR and that's where it ends up looking so crazy?
              I'm pretty sure I remember seeing an interest rate a long time back - which didn't seem massive. Then they had an equivalent APR (which I think is mandated by law) which is huge (because obviously it's only supposed to be a few days loan).

              I don't know, though, whether the interest is capped. I suspect that it must be as after a short-ish time, the interest rate would be totally inappropriate for a long-term loan. So in reality (again, i'm guessing) I would guess that the interest is capped (for that rate at least) - and so it is then effectively a fixed (if you go up to that cap) penalty fee.

              A lot of assumptions there, but it's the kind of thing that viewed as a penalty fee would seem entirely appropriate - while some people viewing it as an APR of 4000% would have a fit even though it's exactly the same.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by cojak View Post
                Breaking legs? How very vulgar! (and rather 20th Century...)

                There's more than one way of breaking the law...

                Wonga's fake legal letters passed to police | Business | theguardian.com
                'Halifax, Lloyds TSB and NatWest's fake letters - Money Saving Expert
                Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy
                I can't see any way to do it can you please advise?

                I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.

                Comment


                  #18
                  yep they were all at it and should face criminal charges.
                  Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by cojak View Post
                    Actually, I'm meeting you half way - I do see the need for emergency short-term loans (with the appropriate APR).

                    It's the business model of targeting the vulnerable who don't have the means to pay it back that I object to.
                    And it gets worse:

                    "Payday loan brokers regularly raid bank accounts of poor customers"

                    According to the report, the account is raided at 3am as state benefits are typically paid in just after midnight

                    Payday loan brokers regularly raid bank accounts of poor customers | Money | The Guardian

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Martin@AS Financial View Post
                      And it gets worse:

                      "Payday loan brokers regularly raid bank accounts of poor customers"

                      According to the report, the account is raided at 3am as state benefits are typically paid in just after midnight

                      Payday loan brokers regularly raid bank accounts of poor customers | Money | The Guardian
                      Using the word 'raided' is poisoning the well somewhat.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X