Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Was the Scotland vote rigged?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Unix View PostThis will likely trigger another referendum. So we get to have another MASSIVE thread on it here!
For a future referendum to have any actual legal weight, the power to hold that referendum would once again have to be granted by the UK government. As the last referendum result was a solid 'no' and as long as the UK government can publicly maintain that it kept to its vow about devolution, there would be zero pressure on it to give that power to the Scottish parliament.
Any attempt to 'take' that right and unilaterally declare independence would result in a rather one-sided curb-stomp of an illegal Scottish separatist government, without even a peep out of the rest of the world. That's not a path any sane UK citizen would want to go down.Comment
-
Originally posted by NickyBoy View Post....That's not a path any sane UK citizen would want to go down.Comment
-
Originally posted by NickyBoy View PostFYI this referendum was only legal because of the Edinburgh Agreement, wherein the UK government gave the Scottish parliament legal approval for a 1-off referendum before the end of 2014.
For a future referendum to have any actual legal weight, the power to hold that referendum would once again have to be granted by the UK government. As the last referendum result was a solid 'no' and as long as the UK government can publicly maintain that it kept to its vow about devolution, there would be zero pressure on it to give that power to the Scottish parliament.
Any attempt to 'take' that right and unilaterally declare independence would result in a rather one-sided curb-stomp of an illegal Scottish separatist government, without even a peep out of the rest of the world. That's not a path any sane UK citizen would want to go down.Comment
-
Originally posted by Unix View PostThis will likely trigger another referendum. So we get to have another MASSIVE thread on it here!
Anyway, shouldn't SNP have disbanded regardless of the result? Since the people of Scotland said they didn't want to be independent, that rather makes the SNP's whole existence a bit pointless.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Originally posted by Unix View PostThis will likely trigger another referendum. So we get to have another MASSIVE thread on it here!Comment
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostNo it won't. You can't have a referendum because some vague promises don't appear to have been kept.
Anyway, shouldn't SNP have disbanded regardless of the result? Since the people of Scotland said they didn't want to be independent, that rather makes the SNP's whole existence a bit pointless.Comment
-
Originally posted by Unix View PostThe vow was very clear and is being tracked very closely as it was the reason the No won by their slim 5 point margin. Even a sniff of breaking it will result in terrible pain for the UK. The SNP will disband when their raison d'etre has been fulfilled, which might be soon based on the early signs of the vow.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Unix View PostThe vow was very clear and is being tracked very closely as it was the reason the No won by their slim 5 point margin. Even a sniff of breaking it will result in terrible pain for the UK. The SNP will disband when their raison d'etre has been fulfilled, which might be soon based on the early signs of the vow.
And no, that wasn't why NO won. The results were in line with every poll taken except for one outlier. NO won because in 2 years, Salmond hadn't bothered to think about how things would work, and was left fumbling for answers with 2 weeks to go. If things like currency - probably only currency TBH - had been seen as solved well in advance, I think it would have gone YES.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Yesterday 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment