• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Darling, Darling, Darling, versus the Salmond

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
    So why would you not attribute revenue to the country that generates it ?
    Its supposedly very hard to attribute oil and gas revenue easily. I don't think its helped by the fact various pipelines hit land in England...
    merely at clientco for the entertainment

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
      Source?
      Knock yourself out

      "Scotland accounted for 9.3% of UK public spending between 2008-09 and 2012-13, while generating 9.5% of tax receipts - it put in more than it got out. It suggests that tax receipts are currently 14% higher in Scotland than the rest of the UK"

      http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0045/00451336.pdf

      Would Scotland be economically better off if it was independent? | News | theguardian.com

      Comment


        #83
        Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
        And so they should have. That's capitalism.
        I think you're confusing capitalism with some sort of natural law
        Originally posted by MaryPoppins
        I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
        Originally posted by vetran
        Urine is quite nourishing

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by d000hg View Post
          I think you're confusing capitalism with some sort of natural law
          If the leg of the chair you're sitting on gives way don't expect some magical QE force to keep you aloft.
          "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
            If the leg of the chair you're sitting on gives way don't expect some magical QE force to keep you aloft.
            While I see were you are coming from, letting such a large bank fail, would have likely brought down many other banks/businesses and caused untold mayhem. Ever heard the expression "too big to fail"?

            Comment


              #86
              Whilst I am all for devolvement of power and direct accountability I am not sure how Scotland plans to get improve its economy. As far as I can see it will be run by socialists who have not got the first idea of how to create wealth
              Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by Batcher View Post
                Knock yourself out

                "Scotland accounted for 9.3% of UK public spending between 2008-09 and 2012-13, while generating 9.5% of tax receipts - it put in more than it got out. It suggests that tax receipts are currently 14% higher in Scotland than the rest of the UK"

                http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0045/00451336.pdf

                Would Scotland be economically better off if it was independent? | News | theguardian.com
                Remember reading the tax receipts statistics a couple of years back. The inequality makes you think, we'll we're used to being shafted, what harm will a little bit more do. But then you see how it's spent, illegal wars, duck houses, etc makes your blood boil
                "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

                Comment


                  #88
                  Originally posted by Unix View Post
                  While I see were you are coming from, letting such a large bank fail, would have likely brought down many other banks/businesses and caused untold mayhem. Ever heard the expression "too big to fail"?
                  A term generated by the bank itself. On my death bed I'll shout NOooooo and an lo and behold I'm injected with 50 years of new life.

                  Many of the bank's customers, investments, were gamblers themselves. Folks who borrowed too much, pyramid schemes. Magic UK QE / your tax money is supporting loses at home and abroad. Yes savers who did no wrong were caught up. My UK savings remain firmly in the building society.
                  "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X