• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Contractor dismissed over Body Tattoo's - the tattoo debate

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by tractor View Post
    Only because tobacco is more accessible and usually cheaper than the high class dope the rich educated partake of. When tobacco was introduced by that well known scalliwag and ne'er-do-well Sir Wally, they all said, where did that dole bludder get the money for a ticket to the Americas to bring back that much duty free eh? He should get a job they said, instead of gallivanting around the world at the taxpayers expense.
    Isn't use of hard drugs higher in that demographic too?
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #72
      .....

      Originally posted by d000hg View Post
      Isn't use of hard drugs higher in that demographic too?
      I doubt anyone actually knows but the point that I am making is that I doubt there is actually that much difference, same with alcohol, it's just that snobs look down their nose at the oiks and their White Lightning but think it's awfully good form to kill their liver with a good red every 2 minutes of their waking life Same difference in my book, it's all hypocrisy and snobbery.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by Batcher View Post
        I'm probably prejudiced then but if I interview two people and one of them has visible tattoos (especially on the neck or knuckles) then the one without tattoos would get the job.

        I know it's all about perception and stereotypes but that's just the way it is.
        So if you had a non-tattooed idiot and a genius with a track record of delivery but a tattoo, you'd hire the idiot?
        Best Forum Advisor 2014
        Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
        Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
          So if you had a non-tattooed idiot and a genius with a track record of delivery but a tattoo, you'd hire the idiot?
          No, if they got as far as an interview they both would/should be capable. In the case that the untattooed one was an idiot, neither of them would get the gig.

          It doesn't matter how unbiased you want to be, when you have two similar people to choose from you will lean on minor prejudices or, alternatively, things you have in common when you make your choice.

          ETA - If someone had a visible tattoo on their neck or knuckles then I would tag them as being the idiot. And I wouldn't believe their track record of delivery.
          Last edited by Batcher; 19 August 2014, 16:45.

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by d000hg View Post
            Isn't use of hard drugs higher in that demographic too?
            Lots of cocaine.

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by tractor View Post
              I doubt anyone actually knows but the point that I am making is that I doubt there is actually that much difference, same with alcohol, it's just that snobs look down their nose at the oiks and their White Lightning but think it's awfully good form to kill their liver with a good red every 2 minutes of their waking life Same difference in my book, it's all hypocrisy and snobbery.
              the key point is the Snob probably paid for their own alcohol & Drugs.
              Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by vetran View Post
                the key point is the Snob probably paid for their own alcohol & Drugs.
                But giving dole money to the oiks helps reduce the chance the Snob is going to be a victim of crime.....
                "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                  But giving dole money to the oiks helps reduce the chance the Snob is going to be a victim of crime.....
                  there is that to it. But then it seems reasonable to be annoyed about that.
                  Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by tractor View Post
                    I doubt anyone actually knows but the point that I am making is that I doubt there is actually that much difference, same with alcohol, it's just that snobs look down their nose at the oiks and their White Lightning but think it's awfully good form to kill their liver with a good red every 2 minutes of their waking life Same difference in my book, it's all hypocrisy and snobbery.
                    You generally don't find many people get beaten up "for looking funny" by assailants drunk on fine wine.
                    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                    Originally posted by vetran
                    Urine is quite nourishing

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by Batcher View Post
                      No, if they got as far as an interview they both would/should be capable. In the case that the untattooed one was an idiot, neither of them would get the gig.

                      It doesn't matter how unbiased you want to be, when you have two similar people to choose from you will lean on minor prejudices or, alternatively, things you have in common when you make your choice.

                      ETA - If someone had a visible tattoo on their neck or knuckles then I would tag them as being the idiot. And I wouldn't believe their track record of delivery.

                      ok, what if you had two equal candidates, one had a tattoo, the other had ebola and an ISIS membership card
                      (\__/)
                      (>'.'<)
                      ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X