While that's great for consumers, it seems a bit weird that one can't levy a fine for not paying, over and beyond the parking fees that were lost by your car being there.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
F'sticks - Parking Charge!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishing -
Why levy a fine? Surely all they should want is to recover losses (including the cost of enforcement I guess - which might make the original sum seem more reasonable, thinking about it).Originally posted by d000hg View PostWhile that's great for consumers, it seems a bit weird that one can't levy a fine for not paying, over and beyond the parking fees that were lost by your car being there.Comment
-
"Fight the Power"Originally posted by vwdan View PostDoesn't mean it's enforceable. I can put that on failure to pay the agency will make me President - but it don't make it so.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PaoLy7PHwkComment
-
-
Pretty much the mantra I live my life by - just ask my wife - though I'm more a Rage Against The Machine kind of guy!Originally posted by CloudWalker View Post
I love a good fight against a corporate or a business, I've just never ever had a parking fine!Comment
-
Do not do that. They will have you admitting to it thenOriginally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Postcitizens advice:
And:
Acknowledge your mistake, offer the cost of the ticket and ask for a breakdown of costs for anything above that, as you think that 60 pounds is totally unrealistic.Comment
-
Just a thought but... This is a private company and therefore cannot issue legally enforceable fines. I should think that they can however refuse to allow you to use their services in the future. What if their next letter informs you that you are no longer welcome to park on any of their sites and to do so would be trespassing.
Can they do this legally?Comment
-
I would have thought a photograph of your car at the crime scene would be as good as an admission?Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View PostDo not do that. They will have you admitting to it thenComment
-
A fine that's not much more than the cost of paying to park in the first place isn't much of a deterrent thoughOriginally posted by SpontaneousOrder View PostWhy levy a fine? Surely all they should want is to recover losses (including the cost of enforcement I guess - which might make the original sum seem more reasonable, thinking about it).
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment