• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

World war 3 now imminent

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    For those who think attacking Syria is a good idea, how many Syrian refugees should the UK take in as a result of the conflict?
    Syrian refugees happened because of Assad in the first place...

    Comment


      Originally posted by AtW View Post
      Syrian refugees happened because of Assad in the first place...
      And Putin's support helped to make it much worse and as a result Putin destabilises the EU, he is already getting more and more support from extreme left and right wing parties who want to break up the EU including UKIP en comrade Corbyn

      Comment


        Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
        ... he is already getting more and more support from extreme left and right wing parties ...
        And the stupid contingent of more moderate parties. Don't forget them.
        Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

        Comment


          Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
          And Putin's support helped to make it much worse and as a result Putin destabilises the EU, he is already getting more and more support from extreme left and right wing parties who want to break up the EU including UKIP en comrade Corbyn
          Yup

          Comment


            Bomb his palaces, his mate's palaces, his family's palaces, his general's palaces his dog's palaces and let him know that when they find out what stone he is under they are going to bomb that as well. The US can have Assad begging for a permanent cease fire in 1 night.

            Segregate the country and then sent the refugees back with some cash and a couple of goats each.

            That scrotum Obama could have done this in 2013 but decided not to and then to throw petrol on the fire told the Russians that they could sort it out. Man was worse than useless, cost hundreds of thousands of lives and gave Putin a lever to feck with Europe.

            Comment


              Originally posted by minestrone View Post
              Bomb his palaces, his mate's palaces, his family's palaces, his general's palaces his dog's palaces and let him know that when they find out what stone he is under they are going to bomb that as well. The US can have Assad begging for a permanent cease fire in 1 night.

              Segregate the country and then sent the refugees back with some cash and a couple of goats each.

              That scrotum Obama could have done this in 2013 but decided not to and then to throw petrol on the fire told the Russians that they could sort it out. Man was worse than useless, cost hundreds of thousands of lives and gave Putin a lever to feck with Europe.
              Obama agreed a deal that Assad would get rid of all chemical weapons. Clearly not a great deal.
              Iran can wait a few years and get back to nuclear weapons.
              Obama left NKorea and all the middle east in a worse state then he found it.
              But anyway he got a Nobel peace prize.

              Comment


                Originally posted by saptastic View Post
                Obama left NKorea and all the middle east in a worse state then he found it.
                But anyway he got a Nobel peace prize.
                Obama was ridiculed when he suggested having talks with Kim Jog On. Trump is being lauded as a hero for wanting to have talks.
                …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

                Comment


                  Assad has bolted to Tehran supposedly.

                  Another place that needs a bombing.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                    Assad has bolted to Tehran supposedly.

                    Another place that needs a bombing.
                    Are you severely mentally ill? Your posts suggest that you are either a moron or deranged.

                    Firstly, Assad had no reason to attack civilians with chemical weapons. What has been suggested is that the Syrian government and the Russian army attacked a storage area that happened to contain chemicals, which has resulted in this sad result. It is suggested in some press this was not a deliberate attack on civilians. If you were to engage your brain you would also come to the conclusion that it is extremely unlikely this action would be performed purposefully.

                    If you've ever had a job in IT, you will likely have worked with some Iranians. If you talk to them over time, you will begin to understand just how progressive the majority of the individuals from that country are - many are progressive and still live in Iran. Iran differs little in the desire of the young populace to embrace progression, except of course that Iran is 'more free' than Saudi.

                    The last thing the world needs is a Minestrone-Trump style misreading of a complex situation and jumping to attacks.

                    Just to reiterate: civilians with symptoms of chemical poisoning in a rebel area (now supposedly a 'former rebel area', due to Russian intervention in the past 48 hours) does not mean that chemical weapons were fired by the Russian or Syrian army.

                    When I joined this forum, I had you down as a halfwit. It's been upgraded to full see you next Tuesday over the months.
                    Last edited by contractorinatractor; 12 April 2018, 23:07.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by WTFH View Post
                      For those who think attacking Syria is a good idea, how many Syrian refugees should the UK take in as a result of the conflict?
                      Zero. Next question...
                      His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X