How long will rofl harris get?

[d000hg]

I can understand not wanting to believe Rolf is guilty. He was a much loved avuncular figure of our childhoods, and we all watched him cry on animal hospital.

I don't struggle to believe he's guilty, I just haven't followed it closely enough to decide if I think it sounds at all unlikely he's innocent.

People are complicated which is why I don't find it hard to believe he really was a caring kind person, AND someone who had a terrible dark side. That's people in a nutshell .

[tractor]

..

I can understand not wanting to believe Rolf is guilty. He was a much loved avuncular figure of our childhoods, and we all watched him cry on animal hospital.

The jury heard all the evidence and unanimously found him guilty. According to one article, much of the detail was too unpleasant to be reported in the mainstream media. It does also seem like there may be yet be more cases to answer.

As the incredibly annoying Rantzen woman said : monsters don't get near children, nice men do.

This is the point that makes me ignore my gut feeling and thoughts at the back of your mind that innocent people have had miscarriages of justice before - after all, that is the key reason the death penalty was abolished. Makes me realise that I am not such a good judge of character. I guess most of us realise that now.

Fact is, there are at least 13 more, if reports are to be believed.

The part about Rantzen also reminds me of how in all of these cases, the heads of children's charities are always interviewed, many wringing their hands and gloating how much more their service is being used now. They give the impression that it's about commerical success for them. Makes me cringe.

[speling bee]

Case of not warning your kids of stranger danger but find out their occupation and then stay away from them completely.

Stranger danger is old hat now. It's a much more nuanced message now for kids, recognising that there may be circumstances when your best move is to go to a stranger for help. When we were little kids, we were told that if lost or in trouble to go into a big shop and find a nice lady who works there. Not the worst advise in the world.

[Uncle Albert]

Stranger danger is old hat now. It's a much more nuanced message now for kids, recognising that there may be circumstances when your best move is to go to a stranger for help. When we were little kids, we were told that if lost or in trouble to go into a big shop and find a nice lady who works there. Not the worst advise in the world.

[KentPhilip]

He's there in the crown court listings page, for court 2:

CourtServe: Southwark Crown Court, Daily Courtroom 04/07/14

[Gittins Gal]

This kiddy porn he was viewing....

Prosecutor Ms Wass argued: “It's the crown's position that the girls look underage and the websites, Teeny or whatever, are an indication that he was looking for underage girls.

“Even if they turn out to be 18 he is still looking for underage girls and that is the evidence we would seek to put before the jury.

“The images look like they are extremely young girls, some as young as 13.The fact that they may be over 18 but have the appearance of very young girls is irrelevant.”

Doesn't sound like it was in the Glitter league. I think there's some awful filth on the internet but it sounds almost like they were accusing him of a thought crime there - i.e. if they were over 18 but looked under age the intent is still there. Hmm....

[speling bee]

I was trying to annoy ms. You've ruined it now.

[Unix]

This kiddy porn he was viewing....



Doesn't sound like it was in the Glitter league. I think there's some awful filth on the internet but it sounds almost like they were accusing him of a thought crime there - i.e. if they were over 18 but looked under age the intent is still there. Hmm....

Yes the opposite doesn't seem to be true "She looked 18 is no defence!"

[mudskipper]

I was trying to annoy ms. You've ruined it now.

[mudskipper]

Do you have a link, GG?