- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Can an agency find out what rate you were on previously?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
No, not at all. Not sure why/how you feel that.Originally posted by Taita View PostSo £1000 per day pay = £1120.00 @ 12% mark-up - which means that your comparison is deliberately (and unnecessarily) misleading by an extra £16.36.
In the example, I used an arbitrary figure of 12% Margin as being a competitors rate.
On a day rate of £1000 @ 12% Margin, the Client would be charged £1136.36 versus our charge of £1070.00 @ 7% mark-up.
It's not deliberate (or unnecessarily) misleading at all. We're stating our charge in comparison to another Agencies charge - quite clearlyComment
-
My point is: Why compare mark-up with margin,; why not mark-up with mark-up or margin with margin? Answer: Because doing it your way, the difference is greater and therefore more impressive. It does not fool contractors why should it fool clients?Originally posted by Hireonomy View PostNo, not at all. Not sure why/how you feel that.
In the example, I used an arbitrary figure of 12% Margin as being a competitors rate.
On a day rate of £1000 @ 12% Margin, the Client would be charged £1136.36 versus our charge of £1070.00 @ 7% mark-up.
It's not deliberate (or unnecessarily) misleading at all. We're stating our charge in comparison to another Agencies charge - quite clearly
Comment
-
Indeed. It's not like we haven't already done this to death in General.Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
indeed.. happy to continue in General.Originally posted by d000hg View PostIndeed. It's not like we haven't already done this to death in General.
I just don't understand why people argue for the sake of arguing
Comment
-
You may have come to the wrong place.Originally posted by Hireonomy View PostI just don't understand why people argue for the sake of arguing
The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
Locked.Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07


Comment