...because otherwise you'd be an employee of the client, and they'd need to pay you sick pay."
Why do agencies still try this bullshit on with experienced contractors?
I sent the agent a link to the full text of the Act, and invited her to find the word "sick" anywhere in it. I also highlighted the phrase "the scope of the Regulations will be extended to cover work-seekers who contract their services through their own limited company" within the text of the act.
Sigh. They're talking to their legal dept now. My guess is our next conversation will include the phrase "Do you want to contact the client to explain why I won't be starting, or shall I? The Business Employment Agency Inspectorate will be in touch to determine why you're imparting advice that isn't legally accurate, and to determine why you are preventing me from working owing to my free choice not to opt out.", followed by them trying to qualify for the Olympic Back-Pedalling Team.
This is the part of the Contracting game I hate.
Why do agencies still try this bullshit on with experienced contractors?
I sent the agent a link to the full text of the Act, and invited her to find the word "sick" anywhere in it. I also highlighted the phrase "the scope of the Regulations will be extended to cover work-seekers who contract their services through their own limited company" within the text of the act.
Sigh. They're talking to their legal dept now. My guess is our next conversation will include the phrase "Do you want to contact the client to explain why I won't be starting, or shall I? The Business Employment Agency Inspectorate will be in touch to determine why you're imparting advice that isn't legally accurate, and to determine why you are preventing me from working owing to my free choice not to opt out.", followed by them trying to qualify for the Olympic Back-Pedalling Team.
This is the part of the Contracting game I hate.
Comment