I've read the previous posts, had my contract reviewed and have now got myself in a knot of confusion based on conflicting advice.
I think the first principle to understand is that this is a business to business contract - me the person having "permie type notice" is not the issue here. I have enough warchest to take being booted off site, tomorrow, on the chin.
My contract review hilighted the fact that as my company has no notice period this can be seen as bad from IR35 perspective as the client and agency has a 10 day notice period they can give me.
I've read some articles that say having zero notice on my side is good as it shows there's a commercial risk should I decide to try and leave early - i.e. I could be sued for not providing the service as contracted.
The contract review company said I should get a notice period in - which I'm trying to do but unsure if the client or agency will accept this.
The agency is saying similar to the article I read. Having a notice period makes you look a bit more like a permie as you want some kind of protection for future earnings, rather than having a contract to provide X service for Y period. For once - I'm inclined to think they may not be telling tulip.
I'm not really bothered what the answer is - I just want to have best practice from an IR35 point of view and also to give the client good service. I.e I'm not likely to walk mid-contract unless there's severe personal circumstances, I can deal with bad managers and the like as my career at the site isn't dependent on it. Plus, I tend to hang around till the end of projects and see them through anyway - ie. till the point where they stop renewing as there's not much work left to do.
What others opinions on this? Do I leave the contract with me unable to give notice(apart from negotiation) - or get it changed so we both have say 20 days each? Please bear in mind my initial point - this is not about me having income protection, and job safety, I'm a contractor and want to make it clear in any future IR35 investigation that my contracts support this statement.
Cheers.
I think the first principle to understand is that this is a business to business contract - me the person having "permie type notice" is not the issue here. I have enough warchest to take being booted off site, tomorrow, on the chin.
My contract review hilighted the fact that as my company has no notice period this can be seen as bad from IR35 perspective as the client and agency has a 10 day notice period they can give me.
I've read some articles that say having zero notice on my side is good as it shows there's a commercial risk should I decide to try and leave early - i.e. I could be sued for not providing the service as contracted.
The contract review company said I should get a notice period in - which I'm trying to do but unsure if the client or agency will accept this.
The agency is saying similar to the article I read. Having a notice period makes you look a bit more like a permie as you want some kind of protection for future earnings, rather than having a contract to provide X service for Y period. For once - I'm inclined to think they may not be telling tulip.
I'm not really bothered what the answer is - I just want to have best practice from an IR35 point of view and also to give the client good service. I.e I'm not likely to walk mid-contract unless there's severe personal circumstances, I can deal with bad managers and the like as my career at the site isn't dependent on it. Plus, I tend to hang around till the end of projects and see them through anyway - ie. till the point where they stop renewing as there's not much work left to do.
What others opinions on this? Do I leave the contract with me unable to give notice(apart from negotiation) - or get it changed so we both have say 20 days each? Please bear in mind my initial point - this is not about me having income protection, and job safety, I'm a contractor and want to make it clear in any future IR35 investigation that my contracts support this statement.
Cheers.
Comment