second job - do i need to let current employer know?

[TOSH1]

I had a permie job a few years ago, and got myself a part time job working weekends. I didnt tell anyone and no one found out. The only problem I had, was when i was on 'emergency' call with the permie job and the phone rang whilst I was at the weekend job.

That took some explaining, thankfully the 'emergency' was just a forgotten password.

Ifs only for 1 month. I'd do it and not tell anyone

[SueEllen]

Many standard contracts try to make out they own any work you do while employed, even in your own time at home. This is basically a load of cobblers

Actually it isn't. There have been some interesting court cases over it where former employees have lost due to developing products in a similar line of work. And if you work for a company like IBM I wouldn't even think about it.

It's simply a case of read your contract before you sign it, pointing out what clauses are absurd and getting them removed.

[VectraMan]

WSS. Full time doesn't mean just the time you're in the office.

I suggest no good can possibly come from telling them about it. They might be fine, or they might feel they can't stop you but will seriously question your commitment from then on, or most likely, they'll just say no because why wouldn't they?

Being able to do this is (yet another) benefit of being a contractor.

[escapeUK]

WSS. Full time doesn't mean just the time you're in the office.

It means 24 hour a day indentured slave?

I personally wouldnt tell them, and Id be looking hard for another job if my normal one doesnt pay enough.

[nomadd]

I suggest no good can possibly come from telling them about it.

This^

And, quite frankly, it's none of their business (literally and figuratively) as long as there is no conflict of interest.

Just keep quiet, and keep invoicing.

[VectraMan]

It means 24 hour a day indentured slave?

Effectively yes.

To the OP: If you can get the contract work, then maybe you should just leave the permie job and get the control work full time.

[calacik]

does anyone know any alternative websites to vworker?

i never accepted work from those kind of websites but I thought it might be worth giving it a try ....
please share your experience if you used before.

[d000hg]

It means 24 hour a day indentured slave?

The contract clauses typically imply exactly this... which is why I suggest they are often illegal because in the UK a company isn't allowed to own you. As pointed out, there are times they can be upheld so if you work doing X and do a sideline in X, a little common sense should be applied. In other countries, the laws are far more supportive of employers and mean they pretty much can screw you over like this.

Knowing about your employer's general attitude and strictness, and if what you want to do has any relevance to your day job or your employer, you need to make your own decision.

[SueEllen]

It means 24 hour a day indentured slave?

No it's open to interpretation like the majority of laws in the various legal jurisdictions of the UK.

The European Working Time Directive and Health and Safety Law stops an employer working their staff to death.

Some companies will need to know if you do other work because under Health and Safety Law you may be putting other people at risk if you work too many hours. For example if you work for a transport company or a company where most people do a lot of driving, they will need to know this regardless of the job you personally do.

As not everyone is involved in this type of work in a business they they also have to put anti-competition clauses in the contract to protect them. The anti-competition clauses have to be written properly though. I know people who have gone to work for direct competitors because the clauses where written badly so couldn't be legally enforced.

[TheFaQQer]

The debate about whether your employer would own copyright is also muddied by how you did the work.

If I was employed by Co A and did some sideline development as a contractor, but used the laptop issued by CoA, then there would be a significantly higher chance of CoA being able to argue that they owned the copyright. Ditto if they paid some of my broadband bill.

I'd steer clear of it, unless there is a massive upside that I'm missing.