I'm interviewing for a role later today that has seemingly already been determinded as outside IR35 (haven't seen an SDS yet), but I've been told by the agent that the client wants two days a week in the office. I understand that there may be valid reasons for being in the office part of the time and that it's not always about presenteeism, but does the client requirement for two days a week put me inside IR35? Or do the reasons/circumstances matter?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Does hybrid working mean it's inside IR35?
Collapse
X
-
Does hybrid working mean it's inside IR35?
If you don't have anything nice to say, say it sarcastically -
Your lack of understanding of what you do, how you do it and relevant key legislation puts you inside IR35 by default regardless of what the gig says
How can you profess to be working outside IR35 when you don't understand the differences?
But on to an answer. What did you do in the old days when you were onsite 5 days a week? Were you inside then? Is every other supplier on site inside? Can a business not operate as a business if it's present on site for some or all of the time? I think you have your answer.
There is then other point that the IR35 status isn't your problem anymore (to an extent without going down that rabbit hole)
You've been around since 2019 so not a noob. You must have seen discussion on this or general IR35 discussions that might have helped you work this one out?Last edited by northernladuk; 1 October 2024, 09:40.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
-
No - it's basically saying the client is looking / expecting the person to be in the office X days a week.Originally posted by KinooOrKinog View PostI'm interviewing for a role later today that has seemingly already been determinded as outside IR35 (haven't seen an SDS yet), but I've been told by the agent that the client wants two days a week in the office. I understand that there may be valid reasons for being in the office part of the time and that it's not always about presenteeism, but does the client requirement for two days a week put me inside IR35? Or do the reasons/circumstances matter?
Your attendance at the office has zilch to do with the IR35 status of your contract - it's just how the end client expects things to work..
My viewpoint is do I get value (for myself and the customer) by being in the office. If it allows me to discuss things in person perfect, if it just means I drive in and spend the days in zoom calls I'm staying at home where I have a far better set up than most offices.Last edited by eek; 1 October 2024, 10:06.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Well, I don't think it's a lack of understanding. I do understand it, but having read loads of IR35 discussions I think that's part of my problem. I've started second guessing it. That and the fact that there doesn't seem to be any consistency with what HMRC do and whether they play by their own rules or not.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostYour lack of understanding of what you do, how you do it and relevant key legislation puts you inside IR35 by default regardless of what the gig says
How can you profess to be working outside IR35 when you don't understand the differences?
But on to an answer. What did you do in the old days when you were onsite 5 days a week? Were you inside then? Is every other supplier on site inside? Can a business not operate as a business if it's present on site for some or all of the time? I think you have your answer.
There is then other point that the IR35 status isn't your problem anymore (to an extent without going down that rabbit hole)
You've been around since 2019 so not a noob. You must have seen discussion on this or general IR35 discussions that might have helped you work this one out?
If you don't have anything nice to say, say it sarcasticallyComment
-
I can understand that to be fair but this one really doesn't need second guessing. Also one minor flag (which it isn't anyway) doesn't and hasn't ever put you inside.Originally posted by KinooOrKinog View PostWell, I don't think it's a lack of understanding. I do understand it, but having read loads of IR35 discussions I think that's part of my problem. I've started second guessing it. That and the fact that there doesn't seem to be any consistency with what HMRC do and whether they play by their own rules or not.
What would a business do?
What do other suppliers that are in business do?
What is professional courtesy to a client?
Is it one of the three pillars?
Is IR35 my responsibility anyway at this point?
Attendance on site has never been a factor in IR35 historically so nothing has changed here.Last edited by northernladuk; 1 October 2024, 11:04.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Don't you mean Is it one of the two pillars?Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
I can understand that to be fair but this one really doesn't need second guessing. Also one minor flag (which it isn't anyway) doesn't and hasn't ever put you inside.
What would a business do?
What do other suppliers that are in business do?
What is professional courtesy to a client?
Is it one of the three pillars?
Is IR35 my responsibility anyway at this point?
Attendance on site has never been a factor in IR35 historically so nothing has changed here.
the Supreme Court said even very short term Mutuality of obligation ticks that requirement making it's use as a get out clause impossible...merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
And there is the RoS which the courts have called a sham before... so one pillar thenOriginally posted by eek View Post
Don't you mean Is it one of the two pillars?
the Supreme Court said even very short term Mutuality of obligation ticks that requirement making it's use as a get out clause impossible...
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
I've always thought RoS when you have specialist skills is a complete sham anyway - the irony is that I did some work as a substitute last month.Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
And there is the RoS which the courts have called a sham before... so one pillar then
Last edited by eek; 2 October 2024, 07:08.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
To be perfectly honest, D&C isn’t a slam dunk with specialist skills either. It is true that the gap is narrowing and you really do need to be vigilant. That said, it’s good to have complete control over where, when and how you do the work, notwithstanding the need for mutually agreed client meetings/contact. The old pillars are all still relevant to varying degrees (and note that PGMOL remains undecided/kicked back), but the big picture is what really matters, how everything adds up.Originally posted by eek View Post
I've always thought RoS when you have specialist skills is a complete sham anyway - the irony is that I did some work as a substitute last month.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment