Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
He asked what the SOP was for consultancies. I was very clearly told at the big 4 and tier 2 firm that I worked for, that clients are not for external CVs.
I don't know if you've ever worked in the consulting industry for a big name employer, but they all mostly say the same. Outside of NDAs, I don't think it's actively enforced though.
Is it OK on your Powerpoint though? After all CVs are for permies....
And the lord said unto John; "come forth and receive eternal life." But John came fifth and won a toaster.
Agencies and their clients don't own what you say about them externally, barring some major exceptions (such as those do do with national security)
I would name whichever party is the most beneficial, and leave out the "on behalf of".
Write what the next agent/client wants to see.
And of course, if anyone asks you "Have you worked for Soulless Agency Robots LTD" you can say "Yes, when I was working on Household Name plc"
a LinkedIn/CV policy is only ever an 'ask' - it's not a mandate. And of course, if you're independent of such organisations, they have even less cause to twist your arm.
He asked what the SOP was for consultancies. I was very clearly told at the big 4 and tier 2 firm that I worked for, that clients are not for external CVs.
I don't know if you've ever worked in the consulting industry for a big name employer, but they all mostly say the same. Outside of NDAs, I don't think it's actively enforced though.
It's not only for the big4. Smaller and mid-size consultancies frequently also adhere to the same client secrecy rules. The contracts with their clients tend to have a non-disclosure clause in them, where they have to ask for permission to mention the client's name for a specific purpose, especially if they work on something of strategic value.
Contracting is different. For clients, that's simply replaceable temp staff brought in from a temp agency (and that thinking is where IR35 issues begin).
Having done a variety of consultancy and non-consultancy work, I'm yet to find a scenario where it makes a meaningful difference other than some vague politics around 'the client' from time to time.
it's like the whole Public/Private sector thing. One's a lot slower than the other and one has people that actually do stuff in it - that's it.
Comment