Originally posted by Eirikur
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
How carefully do you read a contract before signing?
Collapse
X
-
-
I had similar but it was a smaller agency in 2008 and put in the extension. Had a fight getting some of the clauses removed.Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
If the contract would be terminated early by myself or the endclient I would have to pay the agency their missed revenue for the remaining contract period. (Harvey Nash - 2013)"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Did they also tell you what margin they were on, or were they effectively asking you to sign a blank cheque?Originally posted by Eirikur View PostIf the contract would be terminated early by myself or the endclient I would have to pay the agency their missed revenue for the remaining contract period. (Harvey Nash - 2013)Comment
-
It's also a damned good demonstration of how agencies view their candidates and how their business model actually works. It's nothing to do with procuring the best talent for the role, just the most profitable.Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
Oooooh that's a good one!
Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
Nope I told them remove the clause or I will walk away. They removed it.Originally posted by hobnob View Post
Did they also tell you what margin they were on, or were they effectively asking you to sign a blank cheque?
The end client (a city council) terminated half way through BTW, a new (clueless) IT director came in and thought it was an easy way to make some savings by getting rid of contractors and some permie came back from maternity leave, who they thought could do my job, which they couldn't, I found out later.Comment
-
Seems to me the agency was either incompetent or trying to brush you off.
Signing the contract is the final stage to closing the deal for the agent and the contractor. It’s in both interest to solve any last minute issues getting in the way, it’s give and take. If they won’t budge or claiming they don’t know who can do it then it’s probably a tactic. Be firm and tell them which clauses are red lines and be prepared to walk away from these and incomplete contracts. They should be focussed and keen at this point and need to demonstrate a willingness to negotiate with you and their own legal department. If you don’t sign they lose and they have to start over.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Today 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Yesterday 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18


Comment