Originally posted by Lance
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Where to source top talent?
Collapse
X
-
They probably refused because they didn't have the resource you were asking for. I just don't understand how they can continually deliver crap day in, day out yet still bag the big contracts. Someone somewhere must be getting a huge stack of kickbacks cos the tulip just doesn't stick. -
Im my experience companies outsource when the in house team is below average or even just average.Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
They probably refused because they didn't have the resource you were asking for. I just don't understand how they can continually deliver crap day in, day out yet still bag the big contracts. Someone somewhere must be getting a huge stack of kickbacks cos the tulip just doesn't stick.
Management has lost faith in the in house team and so looks externally and then falls for the sales pitch.
Why pay locals around 100K each for a poor project delivery when you can pay offshore bods 20K each for the same poor standard
But if you have a proven talented in house team then it makes no sense trying to do things on the cheap with a higher risk of failure.Last edited by Fraidycat; 20 March 2021, 15:09.Comment
-
Maybe consider changing your adjectives.Originally posted by RedSauce View PostI am trying to fill 18 engineering roles on my team. We are US based (with a LDN office) and are willing to pay US rates which is incredibly competitive in today's market. We have a number of recruiters working on the roles but are not really seeing many good candidates.
The company is a great company to work for and has won lots of awards for culture and WLB but we can't seem to attract great engineers. Does anyone have any advice on how to attract rockstar talent?
I'm afraid that "Competitive" is bull. Even conceptually it's wrong. Whether it's a race or whatever, the thing about any competition in most people's minds is that the leader is just marginally better than others. Rock stars are not interested in being marginally ahead.
Stating the rate is good. Although I'm not all about the money, any role I've ever enquired about where the rate / salary is not stated in the advert, when I get through to whoever, it's clear they are desperate and needy. And the rate has never been what I would have called "competitive". Or at least it's not competitive for me, it's competitive for them. After 20 years of contracting it has not even once turned out to be productive following any advert which doesn't state the rate.
Agencies will often defend this with the argument that they get 1000s of time-wasters. But they have no way of measuring the top 5% who don't apply, so they think that's effective. My view is that agencies get paid to do that sort of handling and if the agency is lazy then the client isn't very discerning. Again more reasons not to apply.
Re the term Rock Star. Unless your package includes the industry's equivalent of a private jet, maybe avoid saying rock star.
Whenever I need to put a team together with top specialists, we just advertise for the top end rate, and put wording in the job spec which makes it easy for the agents to weed out the chancers.
Comment
-
Nicely put. It reminds me of the kinds of BS Dominic Cummings would use.Originally posted by CalmEddie View PostRe the term Rock Star. Unless your package includes the industry's equivalent of a private jet, maybe avoid saying rock star.
Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
"Competitive rates".
Well, if they are so competitive, give them then. "US rates? Who gaf about US rates...
"Awards for culture..."
Well, maybe people see through the bs, style over substance?
"Rockstar talent?"
Rockstar talent have their pick of gigs... something you don't seem to understand. Maybe you're just not attractive to top talent?
Comment
-
-
He did say TOP talent!Originally posted by GitMaster69 View PostI don’t think he’s looking for real, he’s not replied to me
Comment
-
-
90% of the market is cheap these days. Contract rates aren't what they used to be.Originally posted by baen View PostIn situations like these, bob's your uncle. Top talent on the cheap.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment