Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
30 days holiday + bank holidays would be accounted for if you did a fair comparison with contracting, which is not, IMO, typically 230 days billed per year. I am likely to bill > 230 days this year, but this will be an exceptional year for me (I'm looking at 147 days billed in first 6 months ). Normally I bill 215 to 220 days, and I'm something of a permitractor (4 years in one contract), so don't have to take into account gaps between contracts.
What would be interesting to know is the old day rate and how many days you billed a year
And the new perm package
When the numbers are written down we often see
650 a day 230 days a year outside IR35 == 150 K plus you can dividend and wife allowance it
90K a year with a 4% pension == 60K a year after tax
Which is crazy
You cannot budget ideal world. You have to budget realistic. If your market is slowly getting worse (IR35, Brexit, changing skills requirements, etc. not including COVID19) you also have to consider how much could you realistically keep billing.
For example, a traditional PM may have to bite the bullet for a few years and cross-train up to become a qualified scrum master. If a company is going by the book with scrum or kanban rather than playing at agile, you'd find yourself out of your depth and out the door quite quickly as a contract PM trying to blag your way as a PM. If they're using "Agile-ish", you'd probably be OK.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist
You cannot budget ideal world. You have to budget realistic. If your market is slowly getting worse (IR35, Brexit, changing skills requirements, etc. not including COVID19) you also have to consider how much could you realistically keep billing.
For example, a traditional PM may have to bite the bullet for a few years and cross-train up to become a qualified scrum master. If a company is going by the book with scrum or kanban rather than playing at agile, you'd find yourself out of your depth and out the door quite quickly as a contract PM trying to blag your way as a PM. If they're using "Agile-ish", you'd probably be OK.
But if you have three months holiday between contracts that surely is a massive benefit - Why work for twelve months when take home pay is the same for 9 months work
And sick pay - Not many take it - You cant just call up sic when you feel like you need a duvet day
I m not convinced at all that 90K is anywhere close to 650 a day - I ve said it before 650 per day outside IR35 is 150K perm take home pay
But if you have three months holiday between contracts that surely is a massive benefit - Why work for twelve months when take home pay is the same for 9 months work
And sick pay - Not many take it - You cant just call up sic when you feel like you need a duvet day
I m not convinced at all that 90K is anywhere close to 650 a day - I ve said it before 650 per day outside IR35 is 150K perm take home pay
I agree that 90k is not close to 650 pd, but your calculations skew them somewhat unfairly in favour of the 650 pd.
I think we all need to accept that while the norm used to be weeks between contracts (or better) it can quite easily be months now. Throw in three out of my last four contracts have been terminated early due to the project being pulled or heavily scaled down then the new norm might be looking for something twice a year as opposed to once.
I think we all need to accept that while the norm used to be weeks between contracts (or better) it can quite easily be months now. Throw in three out of my last four contracts have been terminated early due to the project being pulled or heavily scaled down then the new norm might be looking for something twice a year as opposed to once.
So any comparison needs weighting in a couple or areas:
1. Risks of early termination and gaps in work
2. Likely salary progression vs likely rate stagnation.
I still thing 650 pd outside IR35 is better than 90k p.a., but it's closer than LondonPM1 makes out.
But if you have three months holiday between contracts that surely is a massive benefit - Why work for twelve months when take home pay is the same for 9 months work
And sick pay - Not many take it - You cant just call up sic when you feel like you need a duvet day
I m not convinced at all that 90K is anywhere close to 650 a day - I ve said it before 650 per day outside IR35 is 150K perm take home pay
If you have 3 months out, you won't book 230 days. You cannot twist it both ways.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist
And a three month gap between contracts doesn't typically feel like a three month holiday.
And I suspect many of us have planned 4 - 6 weeks between contracts and discovered it stretched to 12 weeks when opportunities plummeted. As you say, if you're out of contract because you can't find the next one, it's not a nice time.
Comment