Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Agency won't reimburse expenses
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Sub View PostI don't really care about their excuse, there is zero additional effort for me to invoice that directly.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostZero additional effort? Erm.. no.
There is one additional one, however - I need to create separate project in the FA for expenses for that specific gig .Comment
-
Originally posted by Sub View PostNot sure why they should accept that. We made agreement (informal, but there is written evidence) between agent, client and me that the travel expenses to be paid directly. It is not voiding "supply of services" restriction clause of the main contract.
So they have accepted that clause does not count. You could just as easily add your day rate onto your expenses invoice and I very much doubt that the agency could do a damn thing about it. They might argue and shout/scream but legally they've shot themselves in the foot.See You Next TuesdayComment
-
It sounds as though regular travelling is part of the project so this surely would have been discussed between the client and agency. If the agency think you're paying and put in the contract that they're paying that is a monumental mistake. I'd be VERY surprised if they have a contract clause that is that broad. What if you chose to travel 1st class and drink the mini-bar dry. For them to accidentally agree to paying all travel expenses is odd. Could you post the clause that covers it?
Originally posted by Skag View PostI don't think it's even raised with the client. The client has agreed in a fixed man days contract to start with. So maybe the agency doesn't want to charge them extra? I don't know..Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Today 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Yesterday 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment