Originally posted by TheDude
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
State of the Market
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Not seeing any change in rates tbh. Seem normal to me. But yes there are very few contracts around and add to that an incredible amount of people on the bench, so competition is mental. Don't go on LinkedIn much nowadays but did the other day and I couldn't believe how many people are 'open to work'. -
Comment
-
Crazy. US rates are high, I would quite like to work for a US tech company, as rates for perm roles are probably at least on par with what we might get in the UK outside IR35, and after-tax I am talking about. Had an interview for one during the summer, but I blew it. Would be a good market to get a foot in the door with though.Originally posted by rocktronAMP View Post
The contract rate for this job in the USD 454,545 per day as in https://www.wired.com/story/mark-zuc...t-300-million/Comment
-
-
Hiring manager has learned that I am on the no-hire list due to a past incident in 2022 in which I was unable to join after accepting an offer because of COVID-related issues at my household, as the role required daily office attendance. The recruiter has passed my explanation on to the current hiring manager I am interviewing with. I am not sure what my chances are.All rounds of interviews have been completed.Comment
-
Sorry to hear it.
That brings up an interesting point. At the risk of setting off the tinfoil hat enthusiasts.
What do you mean by "no-hire list"? Is this kept by the client, the agency or is it shared more broadly?
It sounds from your description like the ClientCo is keeping a naughty list.
I would expect an individual agent to remember past insults, perhaps a vetting company, but I haven't actually seen any evidence of anyone in our industry doing this.
Comment
-
Years ago I was told by an agent there was a blacklist which was shared with all agencies. It's a load of nonsense and purely one of the devious tactics they use to get you to tow their line. I also don't believe clients have blacklists either. Have known people go back to clients when they have left under a cloud. All depends if anyone involved in the hiring process is still around or holds grudges. But even in the permie world people move around regularly so often it wouldn't even be an issue anyway.Originally posted by Dorkeaux View PostSorry to hear it.
That brings up an interesting point. At the risk of setting off the tinfoil hat enthusiasts.
What do you mean by "no-hire list"? Is this kept by the client, the agency or is it shared more broadly?
It sounds from your description like the ClientCo is keeping a naughty list.
I would expect an individual agent to remember past insults, perhaps a vetting company, but I haven't actually seen any evidence of anyone in our industry doing this.
Comment
-
No hiring list maintained by end client company ( Agent never mainstains such list as long as you are able to clear the interview) - I noticed this in few companies while raising request for access , I saw a drop down value "Not to be hired again".Looks like no hire list flagged up when it reaches to offer stage.I am quite dissapointed previously i wanted to join but due to circumstances I couldnt.Comment
-
I did a little research, and come to find that a lot of big companies maintain blacklists.
It seems that this is legal, as long as you don't compile or use compiled lists across companies.
In the UK. In spite of GDPR.
This astonishes me. No transparency nor due process, some b*llen* just chooses a value from a drop down list and you are screwed.
Were I you, I might call up HR and explain the situation to see if there is a process by which you can be removed from it. Explain the situation calmly exactly as you have. It's a pretty good reason.
If this doesn't work, I would consider investiling a little time in GDPR RFIs to that company about what information they hold on you.Comment
-
A subject access request is what they want.Originally posted by Dorkeaux View PostI did a little research, and come to find that a lot of big companies maintain blacklists.
It seems that this is legal, as long as you don't compile or use compiled lists across companies.
In the UK. In spite of GDPR.
This astonishes me. No transparency nor due process, some b*llen* just chooses a value from a drop down list and you are screwed.
Were I you, I might call up HR and explain the situation to see if there is a process by which you can be removed from it. Explain the situation calmly exactly as you have. It's a pretty good reason.
If this doesn't work, I would consider investiling a little time in GDPR RFIs to that company about what information they hold on you.
https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/ge...ccess-request/Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment