Originally posted by FIERCE TANK BATTLE
View Post
A party who suffers a breach of contract is under an obligation to mitigate any losses. So if you can replace someone within 1-3 months then you can't claim losses for 6+ months.
You're right it doesn't appear to have been tested because it's not really in anyone interest to test it (although civil legal system isn't very transparent from a reporting perspective). Reputational damage to the client and the umbrella as being seen to go heavy handed against contractors isn't worth it, let alone the expense of it. Legalities are really just about the bottom line to businesses, and they will do whatever costs them the least money, which is typically settling or just sucking it up. I've known a few instances where a client found out an agency was doing shady stuff, like keeping day rate despite being on fixed margin, they were just blacklisted and told they will bring legal action if they seek to prevent contractors from moving to a new agency.
It would be interesting to know how many outside contractors have had to rely on their insurance to cover a mistake over the years, I doubt it's many at all.
Comment