Originally posted by Fraidycat
View Post
How about the GNU Software Foundation? (I know that Richard Stallman was/is a jerk, but respect is due)
How about Guido von Rossum and Python programming language?
How about Bjarne Stroustrup and C++ programming language?
How about James Gosling and Java programming language?
The thing about open source is who has power and control of the repository and politics with the committers.
There are open source repositories where nobody commits anything for years and years.
There are open source repositories where everybody is supremely excited minute by minute (Rust, I am looking at you)
Then there open source repositories where the hey day has come and the thrill has definitely gone.
Open source needs buy-in from human beings, not artificial intelligence, and it is rather akin to songwriting and singers/vocalists.
We remember songs, because how they make us feel and the context around the first time we ever hear the song at a certain space-time in our own wonderful corner of the universe.
No machine can feel. Only, we can feel (sorry Dolphins, dogs and cats; you know what I mean).
Anyone and any organisation can publish open source software with the appropriate license MIT, GNU or Creative Commons,
but how do we know if any of the code is good enough or great?
Open source also requires interest and attention, which mandates an ecosystem and hopefully a graceful and supportive community.
Too often though, we find toxic communities, zealots into whatever thing, be it Scala and ZIO, JavaScript framework of the Zeitgeist, or C# and even AWS cloud.
I surmise that an AI trained in a toxic codebase, might produce some weird answers for less atuned at programming.
So I keenly await the magically AI that replicates "Linus Torwald" curses at some poor Junior / Graduate programmer's tulipty Pull Request.
Just today, Microsoft have a launched a laptop with hardware AI. I wonder what my penetration testing friends have to say about this announcement, notwithstanding the potential spyware and personal identifiable information (PPI) risks to do with it. Just because it is Microsoft does not make it/them a trusted advisor.
Oh yes now just this morning OpenAI and Sky and HER and Scarlett Johansson.
I think James's point is that some of us *( including me)* should become Dick Whittington (and his cat again). Get the handkerchief knapsack, the cheese bun packed lunch, and the wooden stick and go out and find the fortune, through networking and talking with real people at conferences and meet-ups (instead of relying on just Microsoft AI). Find the things that are just on the periphery of the mainstream. And just maybe, we are in the right place at the right time to catch the new wave ahead of the rest of the herd. Because there, always, is a new wave.
Comment