SC Cleared BUT may end up with a Conviction for S2 Harassment !! Advice Please !!

[NotAllThere]

Stay on topic please. If you want a discussion about football - take it to General.

[MancAnt]

The world is full of bellends matey. And you can't win. I suspect whatever you did this guy was looking for it and has managed to get what he wants now - i.e. you getting into grief.

I've had similar hassles with neighbour. His life seems to be about causing grief and getting one up. I know that hes just waiting for me to do something so he can call the police....

Totally agree with you there PsychoCandy .......indeed the world is!!!!
This guy is not liked one bit and his Wife who used to attend all the matches and gob off is even worse ( she wears the pants kinda thing ) ....enough said !!!

[MancAnt]

Stay on topic please. If you want a discussion about football - take it to General.

Sorry ....will do

[diseasex]

Sorry ....will do

if Poland we would beat the crap out of him multiple times until he would withdraw charges. Doesnt apply here , does it ?

[Sausage Surprise]

You're a contractor...hire a hitman

[diseasex]

You're a contractor...hire a hitman

maybe not hitman but if you are about to get charged then make it worthwile. if you didnt touch him i cant see you being charged anything.

[diseasex]

Harassment
In this legal guidance, the term harassment is used to cover the 'causing alarm or distress' offences under section 2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 as amended (PHA), and 'putting people in fear of violence' offences under section 4 of the PHA. The term can also include harassment by two or more defendants against an individual or harassment against more than one victim.

Although harassment is not specifically defined in section 7(2) of the PHA, it can include repeated attempts to impose unwanted communications and contact upon a victim in a manner that could be expected to cause distress or fear in any reasonable person.

The definition of harassment was considered in Plavelil v Director of Public Prosecutions [2014] EWHC 736 (Admin), in which it was held that the repeated making of false and malicious assertions against a doctor in connection with an investigation by the GMC could amount to a course of harassment. The Court of Appeal rejected the argument that malicious allegations could not be oppressive if they could easily be rebutted.

A prosecution under section 2 or 4 requires proof of harassment. In addition, there must be evidence to prove the conduct was targeted at an individual, was calculated to alarm or cause him/her distress, and was oppressive and unreasonable.

so answer yourself - is there evidence you were threathing him of violence? Were you sending mails, text etc to him saying you will kill him or something (they WILL check that communication)? if you called him twice in total and maybe 1 text and just wanted to talk that will not be harrasment,and i wouldn't even hire a lawyer

http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/s...arassment/#a02

[LondonManc]

That bridge you have - cross it when you get to it.

Not Barr Hill or Deans was it?

[MancAnt]

That bridge you have - cross it when you get to it.

Not Barr Hill or Deans was it?

Beechfield 😃

[MancAnt]

so answer yourself - is there evidence you were threathing him of violence? Were you sending mails, text etc to him saying you will kill him or something (they WILL check that communication)? if you called him twice in total and maybe 1 text and just wanted to talk that will not be harrasment,and i wouldn't even hire a lawyer

Stalking and Harassment: Legal Guidance: Crown Prosecution Service

1 phone call...his word against mine. A final i attended where i didnt even make contact with him and just observed the game and 1 other tournament where i spoke/had words with him after we played in the final and his Son didnt even play.
P.s i have been having a right good nosey on the net regarding thw S2 Charge put to me .....petty really!!!
A joke really isnt it....😠