I've been offered a contract with a public sector client (yikes!) with an agent who can offer me an IR35 compliant contract (substitution clause, etc. and checked by QDos). However, on their side it sounds like it'll be a CL1 contract with Capita. I know there were some pretty long threads on this subject but have Capita had to change their wording after a contractor backlash? Or is signing such a contract still bad news?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Are Capita CL1 contracts still bad news?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Cenobite View PostI've been offered a contract with a public sector client (yikes!) with an agent who can offer me an IR35 compliant contract (substitution clause, etc. and checked by QDos). However, on their side it sounds like it'll be a CL1 contract with Capita. I know there were some pretty long threads on this subject but have Capita had to change their wording after a contractor backlash? Or is signing such a contract still bad news?
There are now two CL1 contracts for the agencies to use, Limited Company and Self Employed. The Ltd Co one has been written to be IR35 compliant, provided of course the reality matches up.Blog? What blog...? -
Originally posted by malvolio View PostThere are now two CL1 contracts for the agencies to use, Limited Company and Self Employed. The Ltd Co one has been written to be IR35 compliant, provided of course the reality matches up.Comment
-
Originally posted by Cenobite View PostI've been offered a contract with a public sector client (yikes!) with an agent who can offer me an IR35 compliant contract (substitution clause, etc. and checked by QDos). However, on their side it sounds like it'll be a CL1 contract with Capita. I know there were some pretty long threads on this subject but have Capita had to change their wording after a contractor backlash? Or is signing such a contract still bad news?Comment
-
Originally posted by cherhill View PostI have a CL1 contract with Capita and had it reviewed by QDOS and it passed the IR35 test.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Yesterday 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Comment