- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
GBP - How low will it go?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
We are way better off now than we were in the 70's. Since then we have got progressively better off, on average. We certainly haven't got worse off due to the EU ..... unless you're one of those xenophobe types who don't like them peeps with a strange accentOriginally posted by JohntheBike View PostSo, would you say that we are more or less better off than when £1 = $2.80?
they may think we're worse off, but then, they think we should go back to the glorious colonial days
I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter man
Comment
-
of course we are all better off generally, and I'm not involving the EU in the debate. What I'm saying is that in the long term, exchange rates have little relevance. There will be short term effects as currencies jostle for position, but in the long term, things even out. So we are better off now with £1 = $1.2 than we were in the 70's when £1 = $2.80.Originally posted by Whorty View PostWe are way better off now than we were in the 70's. Since then we have got progressively better off, on average. We certainly haven't got worse off due to the EU ..... unless you're one of those xenophobe types who don't like them peeps with a strange accent
they may think we're worse off, but then, they think we should go back to the glorious colonial days 
Comment
-
Originally posted by JohntheBike View PostWhat I'm saying is that in the long term, exchange rates have little relevance.You’re the sort of person that would argue with themselves and still lose.
So we are better off now with £1 = $1.2 than we were in the 70's when £1 = $2.80.Comment
-
Or lose a court case with the HMRC and pretend he had won.Originally posted by meridian View PostYou’re the sort of person that would argue with themselves and still lose.Comment
-
Or bang on about it infinity times as though it were gratefully received on any one of those infinity occasions.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostOr lose a court case with the HMRC and pretend he had won.Comment
-
Which would still be 0%.Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostOr bang on about it infinity times as though it were gratefully received on any one of those infinity occasions.Comment
-
Comment
-
get your facts straight, HMRC were not involved.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostOr lose a court case with the HMRC and pretend he had won.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment