- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
GBP - How low will it go?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
We are way better off now than we were in the 70's. Since then we have got progressively better off, on average. We certainly haven't got worse off due to the EU ..... unless you're one of those xenophobe types who don't like them peeps with a strange accentOriginally posted by JohntheBike View PostSo, would you say that we are more or less better off than when £1 = $2.80?
they may think we're worse off, but then, they think we should go back to the glorious colonial days
I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter man
Comment
-
of course we are all better off generally, and I'm not involving the EU in the debate. What I'm saying is that in the long term, exchange rates have little relevance. There will be short term effects as currencies jostle for position, but in the long term, things even out. So we are better off now with £1 = $1.2 than we were in the 70's when £1 = $2.80.Originally posted by Whorty View PostWe are way better off now than we were in the 70's. Since then we have got progressively better off, on average. We certainly haven't got worse off due to the EU ..... unless you're one of those xenophobe types who don't like them peeps with a strange accent
they may think we're worse off, but then, they think we should go back to the glorious colonial days 
Comment
-
Originally posted by JohntheBike View PostWhat I'm saying is that in the long term, exchange rates have little relevance.You’re the sort of person that would argue with themselves and still lose.
So we are better off now with £1 = $1.2 than we were in the 70's when £1 = $2.80.Comment
-
Or lose a court case with the HMRC and pretend he had won.Originally posted by meridian View PostYou’re the sort of person that would argue with themselves and still lose.Comment
-
Or bang on about it infinity times as though it were gratefully received on any one of those infinity occasions.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostOr lose a court case with the HMRC and pretend he had won.Comment
-
Which would still be 0%.Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostOr bang on about it infinity times as though it were gratefully received on any one of those infinity occasions.Comment
-
Comment
-
get your facts straight, HMRC were not involved.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostOr lose a court case with the HMRC and pretend he had won.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What did Spring Statement 2026 say about mortgages? Today 07:29
- Rachel Reeves overlooks contractors in ‘thin’ Spring Statement 2026 Yesterday 07:15
- Spring Statement 2026: chancellor’s full speech Mar 3 21:03
- Unlike today’s ‘boring’ Spring Statement 2026, Make Work Pay is transformative for contractors Mar 3 07:45
- Here’s Joint & Several Liability’s big misconception, and 5 key risks Mar 2 06:59
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Feb 27 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21

Comment