- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
GBP - How low will it go?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
We are way better off now than we were in the 70's. Since then we have got progressively better off, on average. We certainly haven't got worse off due to the EU ..... unless you're one of those xenophobe types who don't like them peeps with a strange accentOriginally posted by JohntheBike View PostSo, would you say that we are more or less better off than when £1 = $2.80?
they may think we're worse off, but then, they think we should go back to the glorious colonial days
I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter man
Comment
-
of course we are all better off generally, and I'm not involving the EU in the debate. What I'm saying is that in the long term, exchange rates have little relevance. There will be short term effects as currencies jostle for position, but in the long term, things even out. So we are better off now with £1 = $1.2 than we were in the 70's when £1 = $2.80.Originally posted by Whorty View PostWe are way better off now than we were in the 70's. Since then we have got progressively better off, on average. We certainly haven't got worse off due to the EU ..... unless you're one of those xenophobe types who don't like them peeps with a strange accent
they may think we're worse off, but then, they think we should go back to the glorious colonial days 
Comment
-
Originally posted by JohntheBike View PostWhat I'm saying is that in the long term, exchange rates have little relevance.You’re the sort of person that would argue with themselves and still lose.
So we are better off now with £1 = $1.2 than we were in the 70's when £1 = $2.80.Comment
-
Or lose a court case with the HMRC and pretend he had won.Originally posted by meridian View PostYou’re the sort of person that would argue with themselves and still lose.Comment
-
Or bang on about it infinity times as though it were gratefully received on any one of those infinity occasions.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostOr lose a court case with the HMRC and pretend he had won.Comment
-
Which would still be 0%.Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostOr bang on about it infinity times as though it were gratefully received on any one of those infinity occasions.Comment
-
Comment
-
get your facts straight, HMRC were not involved.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostOr lose a court case with the HMRC and pretend he had won.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Right to Work changes from October 2026: a contractor’s explainer Today 15:46
- Data Kraken v Torry Harris: 5 lessons for software developer contractors Today 06:09
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Yesterday 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03

Comment