Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The point I was making was that the EU spunks 150 million moving parliament around to appease politicians whilst at the same time many people are starving and that 150 million could be put to better use.
Or do you disagree and do you think it is a good use of money?
And the UK spends £350M of taxpayers money refurbishing Buckingham Palace. And will spend about £3 Billion restoring Westminster.
Anyway, it's a typical false dichotomy. It's not feed the poor, or move parliament. The EU is probably rich enough to do both. In fact, they already spend £83 Billion on foreign aid, and from 2021, plan to increase that to £108 Billion. £150M is less than 0.5% of the total aid spend.
Ok - but really do you not think if the EU are to be taken seriously they need to stop seeing the populace as a money pit and actually start doing something to help them?
You cannot tell me that moving the seat of parliament is anything other than a sop to politicians vanity.
Ok - but really do you not think if the EU are to be taken seriously they need to stop seeing the populace as a money pit and actually start doing something to help them?
You cannot tell me that moving the seat of parliament is anything other than a sop to politicians vanity.
It's a bit more than just a sop, there are historical and political reasons for it. I'm not saying all of those reasons are sensible, but there are reasons.
It's a bit more than just a sop, there are historical and political reasons for it. I'm not saying all of those reasons are sensible, but there are reasons.
You're implying that it costs that much every 4 weeks, which is wrong.
The estimated saving if there was only one base is between EUR103 - 109m per year.
Regardless of whether it is the EU or not do you not think in the 21st century we need to stop spending money to support people's ego's?
I appreciate that people will draw parallels with the Monarchy but I see them as more a tourist attraction and it also gives us someone other than politicians to represent us on the world stage - I mean seriously would you trust Corbyn with anything more important than the tv remote?
Regardless of whether it is the EU or not do you not think in the 21st century we need to stop spending money to support people's ego's?
I appreciate that people will draw parallels with the Monarchy but I see them as more a tourist attraction and it also gives us someone other than politicians to represent us on the world stage - I mean seriously would you trust Corbyn with anything more important than the tv remote?
Try and draw parallels with our own Parliament. There's no good reason for them to be housed in Westminster Palace, and indeed no good reason for them to be based in London. If they were moved to a 1970's concrete building in Sheffield then parliament would be cheaper, and also geographically centred to provide more equal representation to the UK.
Comment