A bunch of teenagers would have handled Brexit better
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Ender’s Game
Collapse
X
-
-
You'll not get any argument from me.
But then that is what politicians do isn't it - it's not about the populous its about them.
Good thing we voted to not have to pay for that big EU political circus which moves town every 4 weeks costing 150 million pounds.
Look starving people needing food
Look Money
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostGood thing we voted to not have to pay for that big EU political circus which moves town every 4 weeks costing 150 million pounds.
Look, a bus!…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostLook starving people needing food
http://www.privacysurgeon.org/blog/i...cy-and-rights/…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostGood choice of photo. Did you read the article that the photo came from, to give context?
http://www.privacysurgeon.org/blog/i...cy-and-rights/
Or do you disagree and do you think it is a good use of money?Comment
-
And the UK spends £350M of taxpayers money refurbishing Buckingham Palace. And will spend about £3 Billion restoring Westminster.
Anyway, it's a typical false dichotomy. It's not feed the poor, or move parliament. The EU is probably rich enough to do both. In fact, they already spend £83 Billion on foreign aid, and from 2021, plan to increase that to £108 Billion. £150M is less than 0.5% of the total aid spend.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Ok - but really do you not think if the EU are to be taken seriously they need to stop seeing the populace as a money pit and actually start doing something to help them?
You cannot tell me that moving the seat of parliament is anything other than a sop to politicians vanity.Comment
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostOk - but really do you not think if the EU are to be taken seriously they need to stop seeing the populace as a money pit and actually start doing something to help them?
You cannot tell me that moving the seat of parliament is anything other than a sop to politicians vanity.
Originally posted by original PM View PostGood thing we voted to not have to pay for that big EU political circus which moves town every 4 weeks costing 150 million pounds.
The estimated saving if there was only one base is between EUR103 - 109m per year.
Why does Parliament move between Brussels and Strasbourg? | News | European ParliamentComment
-
Originally posted by meridian View PostIt's a bit more than just a sop, there are historical and political reasons for it. I'm not saying all of those reasons are sensible, but there are reasons.
You're implying that it costs that much every 4 weeks, which is wrong.
The estimated saving if there was only one base is between EUR103 - 109m per year.
Why does Parliament move between Brussels and Strasbourg? | News | European Parliament
Regardless of whether it is the EU or not do you not think in the 21st century we need to stop spending money to support people's ego's?
I appreciate that people will draw parallels with the Monarchy but I see them as more a tourist attraction and it also gives us someone other than politicians to represent us on the world stage - I mean seriously would you trust Corbyn with anything more important than the tv remote?Comment
-
Originally posted by original PM View PostAnd that is really the point isn't it....
Regardless of whether it is the EU or not do you not think in the 21st century we need to stop spending money to support people's ego's?
I appreciate that people will draw parallels with the Monarchy but I see them as more a tourist attraction and it also gives us someone other than politicians to represent us on the world stage - I mean seriously would you trust Corbyn with anything more important than the tv remote?
But, we put up with it to support their egos.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Comment