• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Dynamic alignment

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by Yorkie62 View Post
    BTW Hilter was actually a socialist.Compared to me, Hitler was left wing
    FTFY.
    Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
      FTFY.
      Compared to the betwetting liberal snowflakes majority on here anyone would be right wing.

      However since you have allocated me a stereotype here are a few things I actually believe in.

      Our infrastructure should be, and needs to be, under central government control, but the individuals assigned to run the individual pieces of national infrastructure must be able to be held accountable, in the same way a board of directors is accountable to its shareholders.
      We need to sort out the NHS. Its problems are not just money related. It needs a thorough rework and systems analysis performing before more money is allocated. yes this will cost money be the savings will far outweigh the costs in the end.
      We, as a country need to regain control from the liberal bleeding hearts and snowflakes wrt what does and what does not constitute a "Hate Crime". You lot need to get over yourselves, get your head out of your backside and grow a pair.
      With that in mind our police on the street need to get back to basic policing and the punishment needs to fit the crime committed. Yes this does mean "an eye for an eye", etc. The problem today is that individuals genuinely believe they will not get caught. Why do kids carry knives. Because the other kid carries a knife and has never been caught, and if is does get caught he is told that he is a naughty boy and must not do it again. The punishment simply does not fit the crime. Make criminals understand that they will get caught and the punishment will be severe.

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by Yorkie62 View Post
        Compared to the betwetting liberal snowflakes majority on here anyone would be right wing.

        However since you have allocated me a stereotype here are a few things I actually believe in.

        Our infrastructure should be, and needs to be, under central government control, but the individuals assigned to run the individual pieces of national infrastructure must be able to be held accountable, in the same way a board of directors is accountable to its shareholders.
        We need to sort out the NHS. Its problems are not just money related. It needs a thorough rework and systems analysis performing before more money is allocated. yes this will cost money be the savings will far outweigh the costs in the end.
        We, as a country need to regain control from the liberal bleeding hearts and snowflakes wrt what does and what does not constitute a "Hate Crime". You lot need to get over yourselves, get your head out of your backside and grow a pair.
        With that in mind our police on the street need to get back to basic policing and the punishment needs to fit the crime committed. Yes this does mean "an eye for an eye", etc. The problem today is that individuals genuinely believe they will not get caught. Why do kids carry knives. Because the other kid carries a knife and has never been caught, and if is does get caught he is told that he is a naughty boy and must not do it again. The punishment simply does not fit the crime. Make criminals understand that they will get caught and the punishment will be severe.
        As you're a law and order sort, you must be a big supporter of the #metoo movement.

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
          What I said was sufficient for anyone who can follow a logical argument.
          So are the SNP racists, hiding behind the word 'national' in their party name or not?


          Or to put it in 'set' terms;

          Are
          'SNP' ∈ Racists, or
          'SNP' ∉ Racists

          ?

          NB. The 'etc' in the post by WTFH.
          Last edited by Bean; 13 November 2018, 11:22. Reason: Added 'set' terms
          Originally posted by Old Greg
          I admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf
          ♕Keep calm & carry on♕

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
            I'm not sure he could cope with
            Zermelo–Fraenkel.
            "ZFC has been criticized both for being excessively strong and for being excessively weak, as well as for its failure to capture objects such as proper classes and the universal set"

            Are you sure you want to use it in the first place?
            Originally posted by Old Greg
            I admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf
            ♕Keep calm & carry on♕

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by Bean View Post
              NB. The 'etc' in the post by WTFH.
              I also didn’t use the word “rule”.

              Anyway, must go now and goosestep towards the National Trust, since those who used the word “rule” have interpreted and argued based on what was not said originally.
              …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

              Comment


                #57
                Who was it who claimed it was a rule?
                Was it this post:
                Originally posted by WTFH View Post
                Racists will frequently use “National” in their party description to make it sound like they are just proud of their country and hide the fact that they are racists.

                “National Socialist”
                “National Front”
                “British National Party”
                Etc.
                Or was it this one:
                Originally posted by Bean View Post
                Why not include - Scottish National Party - or is this the exception to your rule?

                …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

                Comment


                  #58
                  Me thinks Yorkie doth protest too much

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Originally posted by Bean View Post
                    So are the SNP racists, hiding behind the word 'national' in their party name or not?
                    That is a fair question. The answer is no. The SNP sits within the tradition of national liberation and independence movements, so that is the context within which the word 'National' is inserted within the party name. The BNP is a fascist and racist party so the context is different.

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Originally posted by WTFH View Post
                      I also didn’t use the word “rule”.

                      Anyway, must go now and goosestep towards the National Trust, since those who used the word “rule” have interpreted and argued based on what was not said originally.
                      You're being too literal and strict;
                      Exception that proves the rule - Wikipedia

                      Your original claim was about racists was it not?

                      NB. Racist ≠ Nazis

                      HTH BIDI
                      Last edited by Bean; 13 November 2018, 12:41. Reason: linky
                      Originally posted by Old Greg
                      I admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf
                      ♕Keep calm & carry on♕

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X