Reply to: Dynamic alignment

[Mordac]

May "start"??

If only this was the "word associations" thread, one might be tempted to respond with "May finished"...

[shaunbhoy]

read through posts twice, before responding please - otherwise other posters may start calling you stupid.

May "start"??

[Bean]

Beanie's parental controls will have kicked in by now.

I just have a life and no wish to be on this forum all hours of the day, unlike say, yourself

HTH BIDI

[Bean]

Just checking that you really mean that the British National Party, National Front and National Socialists were not racist.
That’s why I asked the question again.

You are stating that in your head the hatred of other races is not racist.

British National Party:


National Front:

You need to carefully consider the negatives in your original statement and work out what I said 'Not at all' in response to.

Let's break it down shall we?

Do you believe that the above organisations are not/were not racist?

To paraphrase - 'Does Bean believe those orgs are not racist'

to which I reply, "Not at all" - i.e., Bean believes they are racist




Jesus wept, drink less coffee, read through posts twice, before responding please - otherwise other posters may start calling you stupid.

Surprised Old Smeg didn't point this out, given the grammar Nazi persona they usually fulfill...

[Whorty]

Public opinion on the other hand.............. isn't on my side

HTH

[shaunbhoy]

Beanie's parental controls will have kicked in by now.

If only yours had. For such a vulnerable adult you are allowed an inordinate amount of time in front of the keyboard.

I suppose it keeps you away from licking the windows though, so there may be method in your carer's madness.

[Old Greg]

Just checking that you really mean that the British National Party, National Front and National Socialists were not racist.
That’s why I asked the question again.

You are stating that in your head the hatred of other races is not racist.

British National Party:


National Front:

Beanie's parental controls will have kicked in by now.

[WTFH]

Jesus wept, hopefully the bolding will guide you again.

HTH BIDI

Just checking that you really mean that the British National Party, National Front and National Socialists were not racist.
That’s why I asked the question again.

You are stating that in your head the hatred of other races is not racist.

British National Party:

The British National Party exists to secure a future for the indigenous peoples of these islands in the North Atlantic which have been our homeland for a millennia.

National Front:

The NF upholds the wish of the majority of the British people for Britain to remain a White country and for this reason opposes all coloured immigration into Britain. It further advocates the repatriation, by the most humane means possible, of those coloured immigrants already here, together with their descendants and dependants.

[Bean]

Do you believe that the above organisations are not/were not racist?

Not at all, what specific words of mine gave you that perception?

Jesus wept, hopefully the bolding will guide you again.

HTH BIDI


So, why did you use the word goosestep?

[WTFH]

[QUOTE=WTFH;2599697
Are you saying that the National Front, British National Party and National Socialist parties are not/were not racist?[/QUOTE]

Not at all, what specific words of mine gave you that perception?

Do you believe that the above organisations are not/were not racist?

[Bean]

Anyway, must go now and goosestep towards the National Trust, since those who used the word “rule” have interpreted and argued based on what was not said originally.

Your original claim was about racists was it not?

NB. Racist ≠ Nazis

I never said that being a racist made a person a nazi.

Your usage of the word goosestep in the bolded post above, implies you equivocate racists with Nazis.....or perhaps you will enlighten us with some antiquated zoological definition of how racists goosestep? LOL

I didn’t use the word “rule”, you did.
My claim was that racist organisations frequently use the term “National” in their title.
I then listed a non-exhaustive series of examples. Simple as that.

Indeed, and in effect all I did was to ask a question as to whether you would include the SNP in that list, given it was non-exhaustive and they are a political party with the term 'national' within their name.

Your fixation on the use of the word 'rule' when using a term loosely is a tangent really.

Are you saying that the National Front, British National Party and National Socialist parties are not/were not racist?

Not at all, what specific words of mine gave you that perception?

[WTFH]

You're being too literal and strict;
Exception that proves the rule - Wikipedia

Your original claim was about racists was it not?

NB. Racist ≠ Nazis

HTH BIDI

And you’ve gone off on one again.

I didn’t use the word “rule”, you did.
My claim was that racist organisations frequently use the term “National” in their title.
I then listed a non-exhaustive series of examples. Simple as that.

I never said that being a racist made a person a nazi.

Are you saying that the National Front, British National Party and National Socialist parties are not/were not racist?

[Bean]

I also didn’t use the word “rule”.

Anyway, must go now and goosestep towards the National Trust, since those who used the word “rule” have interpreted and argued based on what was not said originally.

You're being too literal and strict;
Exception that proves the rule - Wikipedia

Your original claim was about racists was it not?

NB. Racist ≠ Nazis

HTH BIDI

[Old Greg]

So are the SNP racists, hiding behind the word 'national' in their party name or not?

That is a fair question. The answer is no. The SNP sits within the tradition of national liberation and independence movements, so that is the context within which the word 'National' is inserted within the party name. The BNP is a fascist and racist party so the context is different.

[AtW]

Me thinks Yorkie doth protest too much