• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Brexit Betrayal

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    That question's already been answered - the EU are insisting that the "intent" is formalised legally as soon as possible into the withdrawal agreement.

    That's only the overt reaction though. The main impact will be less visible, the EU won't trust the UK to do what it has agreed, so you can expect a large wad of cash to leave HM Treasury to the EU before any trade deals are discussed.
    The Withdrawal Agreement and Implementation Bill cannot be enacted (or even fully drafted) until there is a Withdrawal Agreement, so both of those are impossible for the same reason. In short, this is all meaningless posturing (from both sides).

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by meridian View Post
      That question's already been answered - the EU are insisting that the "intent" is formalised legally as soon as possible into the withdrawal agreement.

      That's only the overt reaction though. The main impact will be less visible, the EU won't trust the UK to do what it has agreed, so you can expect a large wad of cash to leave HM Treasury to the EU before any trade deals are discussed.
      So no trade deal will be discussed then. Good.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by meridian View Post
        That question's already been answered - the EU are insisting that the "intent" is formalised legally as soon as possible into the withdrawal agreement.

        That's only the overt reaction though. The main impact will be less visible, the EU won't trust the UK to do what it has agreed, so you can expect a large wad of cash to leave HM Treasury to the EU before any trade deals are discussed.
        But I though it was agreed that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed?

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Platypus View Post
          But I though it was agreed that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed?
          Or is that just an understanding?

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
            Or is that just an understanding?
            That was my understanding


            EDIT: actually, it was agreed
            https://ec.europa.eu/commission/site...int_report.pdf

            Comment


              #16
              Brexit Betrayal

              Originally posted by Platypus View Post
              But I though it was agreed that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed?
              That only refers to Phase 1 & 2, ie the preamble and the withdrawal agreement which may or may not include the transition period), not any trade deals...

              Although the Government will continue to claim that it relates to the whole thing including a trade deal.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Platypus View Post
                But I though it was agreed that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed?
                That's the intent of the agreement, at least until the agreement of intent is agreed, intentionally.
                …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

                Comment


                  #18
                  Brexit Betrayal

                  Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                  So no trade deal will be discussed then. Good.
                  No, not until we've left. There are going to be some very upset people next year.

                  We've agreed Phase 1, we can move to Phase 2. Phase 2 will give us the framework for a future relationship, plus the Withdrawal Agreement, plus any transitional arrangements. In return, the UK will legally settle its obligations (actual payment schedule to be determined), plus agree additional payments and ECJ oversight for the transitional period (but no say on EU regulations, we just have to accept them).

                  Then, during the transitional period that we are all paying for, the trade negotiations can start, as the third country that we now are.

                  May would like all of this out of the way before March 2019 because she knows that any leverage is lost after we officially leave, but that won't happen.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
                    The Withdrawal Agreement and Implementation Bill cannot be enacted (or even fully drafted) until there is a Withdrawal Agreement, so both of those are impossible for the same reason. In short, this is all meaningless posturing (from both sides).
                    I'm not sure it's meaningless posturing - from Parliament last night the actual impact is minimal, but it does set a reasonable precedent that any deal has to be a good one and not just rammed through by May, and from the EU side they're seriously pissed off with Davis treating this like some kind of game, which is damaging our reputation and possible negotiating position.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by meridian View Post
                      No, not until we've left. There are going to be some very upset people next year.
                      I know. I should feel sorry for the EU. However I only care about the UK.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X