Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
If you're going down that route of desperation...
Had Hitler's predecessors promised to close the borders, support the German health authority to the tune of £350 million a week and insist that Germany should only use German laws, then when they surprisingly won, all the pols who were pledging these promises and pledge to implement them turned tail and left, then started to say there would be no closed borders, no £350 million and no requirement to follow German law, then there would be a bigger similarity to Germany under the right wing fascists of the 1930s.
I would of thought Vichy France would be a better example of remainers, though to be fair the French did have Panzers on their lawn.
Is that true? Nothing to do with the parliamentary elections that made him chancellor?
I thought there was only one referendum, and that was about refusing to comply with the Treaty of Versailles. They lost, even though 94% voted in favour (only 15% voted).
Wikipedia:
At Hitler's urging, Hindenburg responded with the Reichstag Fire Decree of 28 February, which suspended basic rights and allowed detention without trial. The decree was permitted under Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution, which gave the president the power to take emergency measures to protect public safety and order.
Sounds a lot like Royal Prerogative.
To achieve full political control despite not having an absolute majority in parliament, Hitler's government brought the Ermächtigungsgesetz (Enabling Act) to a vote in the newly elected Reichstag. The Act—officially titled the Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich ("Law to Remedy the Distress of People and Reich")—gave Hitler's cabinet the power to enact laws without the consent of the Reichstag for four years.
Bypassing Parliament is step 2.
These laws could (with certain exceptions) deviate from the constitution.[152] Since it would affect the constitution, the Enabling Act required a two-thirds majority to pass. Leaving nothing to chance, the Nazis used the provisions of the Reichstag Fire Decree to arrest all 81 Communist deputies ( and prevent several Social Democrats from attending.
Not quite there yet, but there are certainly some parallels with the "Enemies of the People" headlines. If opposition MPs really were going to try to defeat Brexit there'd be those calling for them to be locked up as traitors.
I love the smell of desperation in the morning..........
smells like............ remainers!
No - that's the smell of Brexiters wetting themselves every time they think that the "will of the people" is begin thwarted. Even though it isn't and there are manifestly larger questions being resolved.
No - that's the smell of Brexiters wetting themselves every time they think that the "will of the people" is begin thwarted. Even though it isn't and there are manifestly larger questions being resolved.
We know, Remnants are acting for the good of the country and not on their own self interests.
And it was only the rich who voted to leave. Oops no, only the poor. Oh who cares. Only Remnants see the good of the country.
No - that's the smell of Brexiters wetting themselves every time they think that the "will of the people" is begin thwarted. Even though it isn't and there are manifestly larger questions being resolved.
Manifestly larger questions like who is going to pay the politicians pensions if we leave the EU?
No the rich remnants are trying to quash Brexit and have kicked over a hornets nest.
Comment