Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Thanks everyone for your replies. All good helpful info.
Malvolio, the £156 is just the example. I'll be out a lot more in reality. And fair point on doing more searching. Just thought i'd get an answer quicker with a post given time is short Martin at NixonWilliams - this is exactly my position. My client will not allow me to add VAT on top of VAT (this is also what my Accountant advised to do). Will have a read of the thread now. Craig@InTouch, same as above. I cannot recharge as an expense as the self billing system my client uses automatically creates it as an invoice.
I'm assuming the "hi Claire" one is an 'in-house' joke so will not take the bait
TheFaQQer - I'm not sure. It sounds simple when you put it like that so will ask the question to my accountant and see what she says.
Thanks all.
<cough> ???
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
If he is using the client's portal to claim a personal expense, are we sure it isn't a disbursement rather than a refund of a business expense? Which makes the VAT position correct, since the client's portal will be set up for employees. And if they are paying HisCo rather than him personally, someone is getting it wrong...
busgrw - Now do you see why I say business expense should stay with YourCo? My current client even has a rail ticket printer in the office, as well as a hotel booking system - but since they are for their employees, I ignore them and invoice my expenses at cost plus VAT. Next time, do not agree to using employee systems for payment. And check your contract, just in case it's a convenience for the client rather than a necessity to observe a contractual requirement.
Martin at NixonWilliams - this is exactly my position. My client will not allow me to add VAT on top of VAT (this is also what my Accountant advised to do). Will have a read of the thread now. Craig@InTouch, same as above. I cannot recharge as an expense as the self billing system my client uses automatically creates it as an invoice.
.
I know it may sound daft but you're not charging VAT on top of VAT. You're charging VAT on top on an amount to be recharged. The recharged amount could be £100 or £1,000. Either way, if it is not a disbursement, it's VATable. Both your client and accountant need to get their heads around it. The linky should help.
Thanks everyone for your replies. All good helpful info.
Malvolio, the £156 is just the example. I'll be out a lot more in reality. And fair point on doing more searching. Just thought i'd get an answer quicker with a post given time is short Martin at NixonWilliams - this is exactly my position. My client will not allow me to add VAT on top of VAT (this is also what my Accountant advised to do). Will have a read of the thread now. Craig@InTouch, same as above. I cannot recharge as an expense as the self billing system my client uses automatically creates it as an invoice.
I'm assuming the "hi Claire" one is an 'in-house' joke so will not take the bait
TheFaQQer - I'm not sure. It sounds simple when you put it like that so will ask the question to my accountant and see what she says.
Thanks all.
There are two sides to this - your company and you personally.
As an employee you have spent £156 and so your employer (being your company) should repay you £156. Simples.
Your employer will bill it's client £156 for expenses, and will then need to pay 14% of that to HMRC in flat rate VAT. This does mean you will lose out slightly, but if the client is dictating how much you're "allowed" to charge for an expense then that's often the case. If you have a lot of expenses you should consider whether the flat rate scheme is appropriate for you.
(ignore the Claire reference, it's Craig being mean to me )
Martin at NixonWilliams - this is exactly my position. My client will not allow me to add VAT on top of VAT (this is also what my Accountant advised to do). Will have a read of the thread now.
If it is an expense, then it should be VATable - whether your contract allows this or not is a separate question. What should happen in this case is:
You pay £156
You claim £156 from your company.
Your Company invoices £156+VAT to the client / agency
Your company pays the VAT to HMRC.
Many agencies and clients complain that you are adding VAT on VAT, but as others have explained, that isn't right - you are adding VAT onto the cost of you providing the service. They can then reclaim the VAT back from HMRC, so it's a zero sum game to all concerned.
There may be a clause in your contract which states whether expenses should be invoiced net or gross, and if the contract prevents you from billing it correctly then you need to stick to the contract. It's the same as having a clause which says "we will pay up to £130 a night for hotels" - if you incur more than that, then that's up to your company whether they approve your expenses or not.
Best Forum Advisor 2014 Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership
If it is an expense, then it should be VATable - whether your contract allows this or not is a separate question. What should happen in this case is:
You pay £156
You claim £156 from your company.
Your Company invoices £156+VAT to the client / agency
Your company pays the VAT to HMRC.
Many agencies and clients complain that you are adding VAT on VAT, but as others have explained, that isn't right - you are adding VAT onto the cost of you providing the service. They can then reclaim the VAT back from HMRC, so it's a zero sum game to all concerned.
There may be a clause in your contract which states whether expenses should be invoiced net or gross, and if the contract prevents you from billing it correctly then you need to stick to the contract. It's the same as having a clause which says "we will pay up to £130 a night for hotels" - if you incur more than that, then that's up to your company whether they approve your expenses or not.
Ah but, the situation, from the client's viewpoint, is subtly different. I fully accept the business expense argument and how it should be charged. However, the client are using an internal service to repay a bill incurred by an "employee" (cough...) on their behalf. The OP's Ltd Co is nowhere to be seen in that scenario. Which is why I'm thinking it is in fact a disbursement rather than an expense claim.
Happy to be proved wrong, but I'll give good odds that's how clients and agencies see it.
I know it may sound daft but you're not charging VAT on top of VAT. You're charging VAT on top on an amount to be recharged. The recharged amount could be £100 or £1,000. Either way, if it is not a disbursement, it's VATable. Both your client and accountant need to get their heads around it. The linky should help.
Exactly. This "VAT on VAT" nonsense typically originates with agents that don't understand how VAT works. OP: forget the VAT element of the original expense that you incurred - its not directly relevant to what you recharge. You should recharge whatever it cost your company - in this case, that's the full gross amount as YourCo cannot reclaim the VAT.
If the original expense had no VAT (e.g. it was zero-rated or exempt), you'd still have to charge VAT. How would your client deal with that?
Checked my contract and there is nothing in there about how I should process/ submit my expenses in relation to gross or net of VAT. Think i'll just submit them at cost plus VAT and see if they get through. If they get rejected then i'll just put it down to a loss on my part and not travel again
Comment