Originally posted by malvolio
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
False self employment
Collapse
X
-
Nope - section 7 ITEPA which is the legislation that's been amended is separate from section 8 (IR35) - the Agencies Legislation (section 7) will not apply if income comes from divs but IR35 will still need to be considered and all the same old rules will still apply -
Yeah, I got that - but the objective AIUI was to prevent employers driving their workers - especially lower paid ones like fruit pickers and social workers - to incorporate to save the employers' various overheads and liabilities.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
I thought the typical scenario is that low paid workers were being made to register as self employed rather than incorporate. The new legislation tackles the former scenario whereas IR35 already exists to tackle the latter.Originally posted by malvolio View PostYeah, I got that - but the objective AIUI was to prevent employers driving their workers - especially lower paid ones like fruit pickers and social workers - to incorporate to save the employers' various overheads and liabilities.Comment
-
Oh sorry - no, this was brought in to try and stop agencies forcing what would normally be employees - shelf stackers, cleaners and the suchlike from being forced to register as sole traders - no Eer's NIC's and the workers don't make enough from class 2 and class 4 to cover pensions and stuff.Originally posted by malvolio View PostYeah, I got that - but the objective AIUI was to prevent employers driving their workers - especially lower paid ones like fruit pickers and social workers - to incorporate to save the employers' various overheads and liabilities.Comment
-
Fair enough. Although someone will work out the difference between SE and Ltd and the impact on the new rules though...Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostOh sorry - no, this was brought in to try and stop agencies forcing what would normally be employees - shelf stackers, cleaners and the suchlike from being forced to register as sole traders - no Eer's NIC's and the workers don't make enough from class 2 and class 4 to cover pensions and stuff.
Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
That was the excuse, it's always been about national insurance, if it was really about protecting workers why do the deemed employers never get hit financially ?Originally posted by malvolio View PostYeah, I got that - but the objective AIUI was to prevent employers driving their workers - especially lower paid ones like fruit pickers and social workers - to incorporate to save the employers' various overheads and liabilities.Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
With these changes the agency could be hit as HMRC are using debt transferOriginally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostThat was the excuse, it's always been about national insurance, if it was really about protecting workers why do the deemed employers never get hit financially ?Comment
-
Wouldn't it have adversely impacted umbrellas as well, though? There would be no need for them if large portions of the contracting market had agencies who had to run PAYE (assuming the legislation did apply as widely as some people hypothesised it would), although I suppose the agency could always outsource it to them/engage in a preferred supplier relationship.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostDon't pretend you're happy.
But thanks for the update.Last edited by Zero Liability; 16 January 2014, 17:35.Comment
-
It shouldn't really have had an impact on umbrellas as the legislation stated that the obligation for PAYE would only pass to the agencies if the worker wasn't already being paid through PAYE which of course they are when they're employed by a brollyOriginally posted by Zero Liability View PostWouldn't it have adversely impacted umbrellas as well, though? There would be no need for them if large portions of the contracting market had agencies who had to run PAYE (assuming the legislation did apply as widely as some people hypothesised it would), although I suppose the agency could always outsource it to them/engage in a preferred supplier relationship.Comment
-
Thanks for taking the time to post Lisa, your view is consistent with our reading of the regulations and guidelines. Good news for the professional contracting industry in general.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Comment