• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

False self employment

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    Good news, but...

    This doesn't now address HMG's intended objective. If issuing dividends is the decider the ex-employer who's got his staff to come back as Ltd Cos simply has to ensure they pay dividends, doesn't he?
    Nope - section 7 ITEPA which is the legislation that's been amended is separate from section 8 (IR35) - the Agencies Legislation (section 7) will not apply if income comes from divs but IR35 will still need to be considered and all the same old rules will still apply
    Connect with me on LinkedIn

    Follow us on Twitter.

    ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

    Comment


      #12
      Yeah, I got that - but the objective AIUI was to prevent employers driving their workers - especially lower paid ones like fruit pickers and social workers - to incorporate to save the employers' various overheads and liabilities.
      Blog? What blog...?

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by malvolio View Post
        Yeah, I got that - but the objective AIUI was to prevent employers driving their workers - especially lower paid ones like fruit pickers and social workers - to incorporate to save the employers' various overheads and liabilities.
        I thought the typical scenario is that low paid workers were being made to register as self employed rather than incorporate. The new legislation tackles the former scenario whereas IR35 already exists to tackle the latter.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by malvolio View Post
          Yeah, I got that - but the objective AIUI was to prevent employers driving their workers - especially lower paid ones like fruit pickers and social workers - to incorporate to save the employers' various overheads and liabilities.
          Oh sorry - no, this was brought in to try and stop agencies forcing what would normally be employees - shelf stackers, cleaners and the suchlike from being forced to register as sole traders - no Eer's NIC's and the workers don't make enough from class 2 and class 4 to cover pensions and stuff.
          Connect with me on LinkedIn

          Follow us on Twitter.

          ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
            Oh sorry - no, this was brought in to try and stop agencies forcing what would normally be employees - shelf stackers, cleaners and the suchlike from being forced to register as sole traders - no Eer's NIC's and the workers don't make enough from class 2 and class 4 to cover pensions and stuff.
            Fair enough. Although someone will work out the difference between SE and Ltd and the impact on the new rules though...
            Blog? What blog...?

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by malvolio View Post
              Yeah, I got that - but the objective AIUI was to prevent employers driving their workers - especially lower paid ones like fruit pickers and social workers - to incorporate to save the employers' various overheads and liabilities.
              That was the excuse, it's always been about national insurance, if it was really about protecting workers why do the deemed employers never get hit financially ?
              Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

              No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
                That was the excuse, it's always been about national insurance, if it was really about protecting workers why do the deemed employers never get hit financially ?
                With these changes the agency could be hit as HMRC are using debt transfer
                Connect with me on LinkedIn

                Follow us on Twitter.

                ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                  Don't pretend you're happy.

                  But thanks for the update.
                  Wouldn't it have adversely impacted umbrellas as well, though? There would be no need for them if large portions of the contracting market had agencies who had to run PAYE (assuming the legislation did apply as widely as some people hypothesised it would), although I suppose the agency could always outsource it to them/engage in a preferred supplier relationship.
                  Last edited by Zero Liability; 16 January 2014, 17:35.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Zero Liability View Post
                    Wouldn't it have adversely impacted umbrellas as well, though? There would be no need for them if large portions of the contracting market had agencies who had to run PAYE (assuming the legislation did apply as widely as some people hypothesised it would), although I suppose the agency could always outsource it to them/engage in a preferred supplier relationship.
                    It shouldn't really have had an impact on umbrellas as the legislation stated that the obligation for PAYE would only pass to the agencies if the worker wasn't already being paid through PAYE which of course they are when they're employed by a brolly
                    Connect with me on LinkedIn

                    Follow us on Twitter.

                    ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Thanks for taking the time to post Lisa, your view is consistent with our reading of the regulations and guidelines. Good news for the professional contracting industry in general.
                      https://uk.linkedin.com/in/andyhallett

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X