Does anyone know where I stand.
I worked for a software house as a contractor June 2011 - June 2012. At the start of the contract I requested a signed contract from the client. I submitted a contract to them which I got from the PCG, but they never signed it. However they continued to pay my invoices and accept my timesheets each month.
I appreciate that I should have been more forceful and insisted on a signed contract. However, each month the timesheets where authorized, invoiced, and paid.
During the contract, we deployed to a large client in London. The Clients UAT infrastructure was different to that which we were deploying in development, and there where identified performance issues. The consultancy recognized this but put performance testing off until we got into a production environment.
Several contractors came and went from the project; each one had trouble getting the final invoice paid. I thought I had a good relationship with the client.
I was taken off the project with 4 hours notice, after which I submitted my final timesheet and invoice. The manager authorized the invoice but the director failed to pay it. When it was overdue I queried the payment and got told that there were performance issues.
I answered some of their questions, but each one brought more questions from them. In the end I offered to help them further AFTER payment of the invoice.
The invoice is now 3 weeks OVERDUE. They have paid nearly 20% last week, but still have over £6000 outstanding.
I have informed them that I own all rights to my code until the invoice is paid in full, and that if they fail to pay the invoice I will have to inform the end client that the software is not fully licenced as the consultancy have failed to pay for it.
It looks like the consultancy is trying to withhold my invoicie (which was for development work) until I fix their performance issues (for free).
Does anyone know the legal standing on any of this?
Thanks.
I worked for a software house as a contractor June 2011 - June 2012. At the start of the contract I requested a signed contract from the client. I submitted a contract to them which I got from the PCG, but they never signed it. However they continued to pay my invoices and accept my timesheets each month.
I appreciate that I should have been more forceful and insisted on a signed contract. However, each month the timesheets where authorized, invoiced, and paid.
During the contract, we deployed to a large client in London. The Clients UAT infrastructure was different to that which we were deploying in development, and there where identified performance issues. The consultancy recognized this but put performance testing off until we got into a production environment.
Several contractors came and went from the project; each one had trouble getting the final invoice paid. I thought I had a good relationship with the client.
I was taken off the project with 4 hours notice, after which I submitted my final timesheet and invoice. The manager authorized the invoice but the director failed to pay it. When it was overdue I queried the payment and got told that there were performance issues.
I answered some of their questions, but each one brought more questions from them. In the end I offered to help them further AFTER payment of the invoice.
The invoice is now 3 weeks OVERDUE. They have paid nearly 20% last week, but still have over £6000 outstanding.
I have informed them that I own all rights to my code until the invoice is paid in full, and that if they fail to pay the invoice I will have to inform the end client that the software is not fully licenced as the consultancy have failed to pay for it.
It looks like the consultancy is trying to withhold my invoicie (which was for development work) until I fix their performance issues (for free).
Does anyone know the legal standing on any of this?
Thanks.


Comment