• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

David Gauke Comments on Newsnight / BBC / Freelances / Multiple contracts

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    David Gauke Comments on Newsnight / BBC / Freelances / Multiple contracts

    If anyone saw Newsnight last night, although some of the comments are also in the general press this morning.

    It was interesting Gavin Esler mentioned to Mr Gauke the BBC controversey about it's presenters working through PSCs. Mr Gauke clearly said if a presenter (but read than as any freelancer) only works for the BBC then morally that person should pay NICs, PAYE etc....

    He then went onto say, BUT in the case of somone working through a PSC because they have Multiple Clients, then this way of working is completely understandable.

    I find this interesting, as I have always read / been told / understood that HMRC will investigate each individual contract, and it makes no difference if you have concurrent contracts. They are all individual.

    Two points that come out from his comments are him assuming if you work for just one company he thinks it is wrong to not pay NICs and PAYE as if you were working for that one employer - and vice versa he thinks it's OK if you work for more than one client to then use a PSC.

    This seems to just rip up everything about what IR35 is about.

    #2
    The interview is on iPlayer here, it's the lead story on last nights show:

    BBC iPlayer - Newsnight: 23/07/2012

    Comment


      #3
      Multiple simultaneous contracts or multiple over a 2 year period are very different, which did he say? Sorry can’t watch the iplayer until later.

      Comment


        #4
        Agree with Moggy - I think there was a silent 'simultaneous'
        Connect with me on LinkedIn

        Follow us on Twitter.

        ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by rawly View Post
          If anyone saw Newsnight last night, although some of the comments are also in the general press this morning.

          It was interesting Gavin Esler mentioned to Mr Gauke the BBC controversey about it's presenters working through PSCs. Mr Gauke clearly said if a presenter (but read than as any freelancer) only works for the BBC then morally that person should pay NICs, PAYE etc....

          He then went onto say, BUT in the case of somone working through a PSC because they have Multiple Clients, then this way of working is completely understandable.

          I find this interesting, as I have always read / been told / understood that HMRC will investigate each individual contract, and it makes no difference if you have concurrent contracts. They are all individual.

          Two points that come out from his comments are him assuming if you work for just one company he thinks it is wrong to not pay NICs and PAYE as if you were working for that one employer - and vice versa he thinks it's OK if you work for more than one client to then use a PSC.

          This seems to just rip up everything about what IR35 is about.
          I always assumed they are taken individually as you could have two contracts, one inside one outside, however the fact you have more than one contract will be taken into consideration among the specifics of the individual contract in determining the status.
          Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy
          I can't see any way to do it can you please advise?

          I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.

          Comment


            #6
            The IR's position has been that it is contract by contract. It is entirely possible to have two PAYE jobs - Rose and Crown at lunchtimes and the Pig and Wicket in the evenings.
            Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

            Comment


              #7
              Concurrent, is what I meant yes. The BBC are actually conducting a serious review of its use of Freelancers and using PSCs. The accusation being they and them are avoiding NICs and PAYE.

              This is a link to the story regarding the BBC's review:

              http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-18868079

              "With the amount of public concern expressed today, I think I have to say yes, we will review it, and we will review it with real seriousness," Ms Patel told the committee. But can I emphasise that none of this is designed to avoid tax. That is not why we use an extensive number of freelance contracts at the BBC," she added."

              On a case by case basic, the usual IR35 compliance applies here, and we can't just assume someone with a single contract with the BBC (or whoever else) should morally be paying NICs and PAYE - this was the other broad stroke comment made by Mr Gauke, if you listen to what he said.
              Last edited by rawly; 24 July 2012, 09:35.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                The IR's position has been that it is contract by contract. It is entirely possible to have two PAYE jobs - Rose and Crown at lunchtimes and the Pig and Wicket in the evenings.
                Actually, the release of the Business Tests by HMRC (aka the Victim Tests) was accompanied by an assertion that they would look at the whole business, not indvidual contracts. That was a major shift from their side. However, since IR35 hasn't changed, it will still be prosecuted on a contract-by-contract basis. At the end of the day, HMRC stil have to prove their case, and the usual defences are still there to be used.

                Gauke fully understands the nature of Freelancing, he's had enough briefings from PCG and others on the subject. However there is a political agenda overriding the business one.
                Blog? What blog...?

                Comment


                  #9
                  If someone has several simultaneous contracts HMRC are not going to look at them. They'd just move on.

                  The contract by contract basis refers more to situations where you move from on contract to another.

                  The fact that you're juggling several clients is a huge pointer outside.

                  However if you had a main contract and did bits and bobs for other clients that would be fairly neutral. That was covered in a judgement.

                  That would be my understanding.
                  I'm alright Jack

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
                    If someone has several simultaneous contracts HMRC are not going to look at them. They'd just move on.

                    The contract by contract basis refers more to situations where you move from on contract to another.

                    The fact that you're juggling several clients is a huge pointer outside.

                    However if you had a main contract and did bits and bobs for other clients that would be fairly neutral. That was covered in a judgement.

                    That would be my understanding.
                    IIRC the latter scenario was also covered in one of the examples in the guidance associated with the business entity tests where the contractor was deemed inside for the main contract but outside for the other stuff. But the fact that you're juggling several clients simultaneously isn't a "big pointer outside" from anything official I have read, so I'm not sure about your first statement.....

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X