Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008
Either I'm being stupid or I just can't figure why these 2 subjects should be unrelated, surely they are intertwined?
Btw – I’m not remotely concerned for the finances of WG either. I’m sure Montp did perfectly well out of the arrangement, it is called business!
Also, I sent an email as requested by NTRT to the HMRC stooge Gauke got to reply on his behalf and have yet to receive a reply. Any one else had this problem?
Either I'm being stupid or I just can't figure why these 2 subjects should be unrelated, surely they are intertwined?
Btw – I’m not remotely concerned for the finances of WG either. I’m sure Montp did perfectly well out of the arrangement, it is called business!
Also, I sent an email as requested by NTRT to the HMRC stooge Gauke got to reply on his behalf and have yet to receive a reply. Any one else had this problem?
Thanks.
Hooray, I thought I was cracking up, maybe not.
The subjects are very much related and I too am not interested in WG's financial situation, but I have some interest in my own.
Sorry if I missed this DR, but did you have any thoughts on this? i.e. what constitutes a closure notice.... I don't think I ever received anything labelled as such - just determination of extra tax for those years in question.
Sorry if I missed this DR, but did you have any thoughts on this? i.e. what constitutes a closure notice.... I don't think I ever received anything labelled as such - just determination of extra tax for those years in question.
"Notice of Further Assessment", where there was no prior enquiry, is essentially a discovery assessment. It's equivalent to opening an enquiry under discovery and then issuing a closure notice, all in one go.
HMRC's use of discovery will need to be tested at the FTT. Their position is weakest where a tax return contained a DOTAS scheme reference number.
"Notice of Further Assessment", where there was no prior enquiry, is essentially a discovery assessment. It's equivalent to opening an enquiry under discovery and then issuing a closure notice, all in one go.
HMRC's use of discovery will need to be tested at the FTT. Their position is weakest where a tax return contained a DOTAS scheme reference number.
How does discovery stand up against the notion that now it's 'full retrospection' and not merely clarifcation of the existing 1987 law?
Comment