• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Thought this might be of interested to some of you guys.

    BBC News - HMRC's David Heaton quits after offering tips on avoiding tax
    "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

    Comment


      Originally posted by nevergiveup View Post
      Well if somehow we eventually win this nightmare, then they would collect the loan payments??
      Erm - what!

      Totally unrelated subjects - surely.

      Comment


        Originally posted by lucozade View Post
        Erm - what!

        Totally unrelated subjects - surely.
        Either I'm being stupid or I just can't figure why these 2 subjects should be unrelated, surely they are intertwined?

        Btw – I’m not remotely concerned for the finances of WG either. I’m sure Montp did perfectly well out of the arrangement, it is called business!

        Also, I sent an email as requested by NTRT to the HMRC stooge Gauke got to reply on his behalf and have yet to receive a reply. Any one else had this problem?

        Thanks.

        Comment


          Originally posted by SLB View Post
          Either I'm being stupid or I just can't figure why these 2 subjects should be unrelated, surely they are intertwined?

          Btw – I’m not remotely concerned for the finances of WG either. I’m sure Montp did perfectly well out of the arrangement, it is called business!

          Also, I sent an email as requested by NTRT to the HMRC stooge Gauke got to reply on his behalf and have yet to receive a reply. Any one else had this problem?

          Thanks.
          Hooray, I thought I was cracking up, maybe not.

          The subjects are very much related and I too am not interested in WG's financial situation, but I have some interest in my own.

          Comment


            Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
            Will find out and get back to you on this.
            Sorry if I missed this DR, but did you have any thoughts on this? i.e. what constitutes a closure notice.... I don't think I ever received anything labelled as such - just determination of extra tax for those years in question.

            Comment


              Originally posted by swede View Post
              Sorry if I missed this DR, but did you have any thoughts on this? i.e. what constitutes a closure notice.... I don't think I ever received anything labelled as such - just determination of extra tax for those years in question.
              "Notice of Further Assessment", where there was no prior enquiry, is essentially a discovery assessment. It's equivalent to opening an enquiry under discovery and then issuing a closure notice, all in one go.

              HMRC's use of discovery will need to be tested at the FTT. Their position is weakest where a tax return contained a DOTAS scheme reference number.

              Comment


                Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
                "Notice of Further Assessment", where there was no prior enquiry, is essentially a discovery assessment. It's equivalent to opening an enquiry under discovery and then issuing a closure notice, all in one go.

                HMRC's use of discovery will need to be tested at the FTT. Their position is weakest where a tax return contained a DOTAS scheme reference number.
                How does discovery stand up against the notion that now it's 'full retrospection' and not merely clarifcation of the existing 1987 law?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by the great escape View Post
                  How does discovery stand up against the notion that now it's 'full retrospection' and not merely clarifcation of the existing 1987 law?
                  Don't know. HMRC have used discovery extensively (indiscriminately?) so there are several different scenarios that will need to be tested.

                  Comment


                    Panorama

                    Did anyone watch last nights Panorama ?

                    You can watch Panorama: Tax, Lies and Videotape on BBC One, Monday 16 September at 20:30 BST and then in the UK on the BBC iPlayer
                    SAY NO TO RETROSPECTIVE TAX

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by zippo View Post
                      Did anyone watch last nights Panorama ?

                      You can watch Panorama: Tax, Lies and Videotape on BBC One, Monday 16 September at 20:30 BST and then in the UK on the BBC iPlayer
                      Yes sure did.

                      Usual Gauke not answering the question directly.

                      That new scheme for corporates sounded interesting considering it's in the Tax manuals. Wonder if they will use retrospection with this one.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X