No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008

[cojak]

Rachel has been a busy girl. I wonder where she works?

Safe to say that she won't get a warm welcome here (though I might throw her to the wolves in General...)

[screwthis]

Rachel has been a busy girl. I wonder where she works?

Safe to say that she won't get a warm welcome here (though I might throw her to the wolves in General...)

To have been so busy she must be motivated by serious jealousy and/or transferance of blame for her own failings.

Assuming she is not a). A stooge and b). That is her real name...she must be known to at least one of us. She says she was personally undercut by one (or more) of us.

[screwthis]

...I wonder where she works?

Not in IT any more according to her.
Apparently 50% of £100,000 to £200,000 for her and the same for her husband is not enough for them to survive on.

So I wonder what other industry she went to work in that is preferable to dropping her £200,000k a year rates a bit. (not that you would have to drop them because market rates are market rates).

[Rhydd]

Rachel

Rachel has been a busy girl. I wonder where she works?

Safe to say that she won't get a warm welcome here (though I might throw her to the wolves in General...)

Let's attack the message, not the messenger.

Some posters have come up with really good suggested soundbite responses to her original post. So let's post our responses wherever we see her message or others like it.

Let's not permit her view to be stated without putting our alternative sound and legal case out there too!

[SantaClaus]

Rachel has been a busy girl. I wonder where she works?

Safe to say that she won't get a warm welcome here (though I might throw her to the wolves in General...)

If "Rachel" doesn't work at HMRC, I'm a pink elephant with wings.

[DonkeyRhubarb]

Let's attack the message, not the messenger.

Some posters have come up with really good suggested soundbite responses to her original post. So let's post our responses wherever we see her message or others like it.

Let's not permit her view to be stated without putting our alternative sound and legal case out there too!

I suspect we're the only ones who've even noticed her comments, and it's probably best just to ignore them.

[deckster]

I suspect we're the only ones who've even noticed her comments, and it's probably best just to ignore them.

Agree entirely. We're not going to change her mind, and we are already engaging with anybody of influence so we really have nothing to gain by getting into online spats.

[NigelJK]

Anther tack (I've seen used against Councils who insist on issuing known-to-be-defective fines/notices to motorists) is Unjust enrichment.
One fellow campaigner made Glasgow Council repay £10m collected unjustly. I'll see if I can dig up more details for you guys (I've no invested interest myself, except a hatred for incompetence/criminality in the 'authorities').

[Richard Splash]

I suspect we're the only ones who've even noticed her comments, and it's probably best just to ignore them.

100% correct DR she should be ignored completely - he, he he... Are there any women here? no, no no... (Ah bless Monty python...
Is Rachel really a woman??? Perhaps so but only on a weekends darling...!

[smalldog]

100% correct DR she should be ignored completely - he, he he... Are there any women here? no, no no... (Ah bless Monty python...
Is Rachel really a woman??? Perhaps so but only on a weekends darling...!

Maybe AB has had a sex change.