Originally posted by Wembley53
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
The problem for them all is
Originally posted by nevergiveup View PostSome MPs must be dumber than I ever thought they were if they think were just going to shut up!Comment
-
Originally posted by Wembley53 View PostSame reply for me from him. KO19 on its way!Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostI think there is a message coming down from above to shut us up.
A few people have had letters from Tories in recent days basically saying that there is no point in any further discussion.
Whitehouse are formulating a response.Comment
-
Originally posted by BarneyCool View PostThe fact that they cannot honestly answer any of our questions or argue any of the points truthfully, as all that we did was open upfront and honest. When faced with all the facts it would seem that it is their only option to shut up and hope it goes away. I would like to think at least one of them has the Cahoonas to fight for the truth.
However, we are looking at someone, as apparently in Gauke's case, who is prepared to sell his principles for cash. What was wrong in principle for Gauke in 2008 cannot now be right in principle unless Gauke is prepared to state publicly that he and all the Tories and LibDems were wrong in 2008.
It is truly disappointing to see a public figure sell out so cheaply at the expense of normal and decent people. Gauke's persistence in the face of damning evidence shows an extraordinary lack of judgment from a front bench politician. The essence of our case is that consecutive Exchequer Secretaries have relied on information provided to them by HMRC which we can prove without any ambiguity is and has been completely untrue at a time when HMRC were in possession of the truth. That potentially makes the individuals in HMRC who passed the information then and continue to do so chargeable to some very serious charges. Gauke is responsible for these people and as such he is questionably unfit for office.
Misleading of Parliament is a heinous crime.Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
"Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECDComment
-
Originally posted by nevergiveup View PostSome MPs must be dumber than I ever thought they were if they think were just going to shut up!
The flip side.... HMRC & MP's are going to look more and more foolish the longer this goes on.MUTS likes it HotComment
-
Originally posted by nevergiveup View PostHave either of you had a meeting with this MP?
Wallace is a conservative btw.I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!Comment
-
Originally posted by swede View PostIs it just Tories coming back with this response? I'm due one response from mine too, so I shall expect the same.
Apparently Gauke met with a bunch of them Tuesday lunchtime. I suspect he may be a bit rattled because one of the MPs told his constituent:
"the Labour Party do not wish to revisit this and we now know the coalition parties do not either"
This is simply not true.
We are getting almost unanimous support from Labour and Libdem MPs, and many Tories don't agree with it either.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostYes it's just Tories.
Apparently Gauke met with a bunch of them Tuesday lunchtime. I suspect he may be a bit rattled because one of the MPs told his constituent:
"the Labour Party do not wish to revisit this and we now know the coalition parties do not either"
This is simply not true.
We are getting almost unanimous support from Labour and Libdem MPs, and many Tories don't agree with it either.
I seem to recall that Gauke himself didn't agree with it either. He must feel a right Mug. If it was not for the fact that he has produced children I would have thought that he was also a Eunuch.Last edited by BarneyCool; 24 May 2012, 11:21.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post"the Labour Party do not wish to revisit this and we now know the coalition parties do not either"
As I said before, some MPs will put principles above politics. There is no need for our issue to be political, while Gauke prefers the safety in numbers of it being so, thereby forcing others to betray their principles in the process. Interesting that by doing so he draws Osborne and Cameron into the same place.Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
"Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECDComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment