Originally posted by freedomFighter2014
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch. -
Originally posted by OnYourBikeGB View PostProbably the same troll that always shows up when we go outside of the forum. A particularly sad individual, who must really want someone to pay him some attention. And yes, I am also sure it is someone who turns up here. Don't engage, that's how he gets his kicks when he's not having a
But I agree about not engaging."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
Originally posted by helen7 View PostNone of my returns were signed off. HMRC opened enquiries into all of them within 12 months.
This was brought up in court as justification of the retro element that we should have always expected to pay the tax.
What annoys me off is they waited 7 years before taking any action and then never challenged on legal grounds.
I would be interested to know if we could legally challenge the interest accumulation until at least 2006 (when GB warned schemes would be closed with retrospective effect satin back to 2006)'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
-
Originally posted by SantaClaus View PostDon't forget HMRC asked us to wait for the outcome of the 4 test cases which they failed to bring to tribunal.
We were waiting for the outcome of the test case, as requested by HMRC, not letting sleeping dogs lie!!!Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI am aware the monpelier have contributed nothing to the ntrt fighting fund.
I am starting to feel let down by them. I the past I did feel supported by them - but I feel now they could do more.
I do have some background information on this I am not prepared to share publicly - I will only share with those who attend.
I intend to organize a demonstration at the montpelier office in the IoM. It will be totally peaceful - the aim is to generate publicity and to shame montpelier into making a contribution.
Please PM me with your email if there is any interest.
BP
Lets not forget that the vast majority of scheme promoters seem to have disappeared and won't be representing their users, who will likely have to pay up without any plausible chance of winning their appeal even if their scheme was sound. Unless they can afford representation at FTT, High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. HMRC have no particular incentive not to appeal if they lose at the FTT - where previously they might not have bothered.
Kudos to Montpelier for sticking with it. There is still legs to our appeal. I don't know how significant it is but it sounds like there is a technical error in the S58 legislation....Last edited by bananarepublic; 19 June 2014, 16:12.Comment
-
Originally posted by smalldog View PostComment
-
Originally posted by bananarepublic View PostIt would be totally counter productive for Montpelier to contribute to NTRT. It would be very effective propaganda for the government. NTRT should remain, in my view funded by individuals affected by S58.
Lets not forget that the vast majority of scheme promoters seem to have disappeared and won't be representing their users, who will likely have to pay up without any plausible chance of winning their appeal even if their scheme was sound. Unless they can afford representation at FTT, High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. HMRC have no particular incentive not to appeal if they lose at the FTT - where previously they might not have bothered.
Kudos to Montpelier for sticking with it. There is still legs to our appeal. I don't know how significant it is but it sounds like there is a technical error in the S58 legislation....
Reading some of the threads over on the EBT thread have made me think we have a lot to be thankful Montp. I don't care what their motivation is along as they stick to their guns.Comment
-
Originally posted by OnYourBikeGB View Postwhs
Reading some of the threads over on the EBT thread have made me think we have a lot to be thankful Montp. I don't care what their motivation is along as they stick to their guns.Comment
-
Originally posted by OnYourBikeGB View Postwhs
Reading some of the threads over on the EBT thread have made me think we have a lot to be thankful Montp. I don't care what their motivation is along as they stick to their guns.
For example: Scheme A has 'dissapeard' although they resurfaced as another scheme, which itself has since been reincarnated as another scheme. It's worth noting that, whilst these schemes were not regulated, if they were managed incorrectly or negligently then users may have recourse to the courts to claim damages. That is if you can find them of course.Comment
Topic is closed
Partners
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment