**termination with no notice - breach of contract**court case *help needed*

[psychocandy]

I'm enjoying this thread and the OP is getting an unnecessarily hard time. It may be true that the rest of us couldn't be bothered with this kind of court case, but the OP has a grudge, which should be celebrated. This outpouring of outrage is a little spark of poetry in the dull prose of contracting.

+1 for Old Greg....

[KittyCat]

No you are not. A business knows how it's accounts and finances are run properly.

Really! think the taxman and/or courts may disagree somewhat!

& I am a business (Ltd is a clue!) - i.e. the case is the business v the agency

Its (some) of you guys who say its not; ir35, permy, contractor blah blah - sticking to the FACTS - Its a business

[northernladuk]

Really! think the taxman and/or courts may disagree somewhat!

& I am a business (Ltd is a clue!) - i.e. the case is the business v the agency

Its (some) of you guys who say its not; ir35, permy, contractor blah blah - sticking to the FACTS - Its a business

You are a person holding a LTD company who doesn't understand its finances.

http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...ml#post1438131

[KittyCat]

You are a person holding a LTD company who doesn't understand its finances.

http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...ml#post1438131

I was double checking (called prudence) - as you dont know the companies finances, trading activity, Directors income etc - you are in no position to judge anything?

I've had no problem with my accounts? & the tricks I've missed I'll be claiming back thru adjustments (yes - its allowed!).

[Spacecadet]

I was double checking (called prudence) - as you dont know the companies finances, trading activity, Directors income etc - you are in no position to judge anything?

I've had no problem with my accounts? & the tricks I've missed I'll be claiming back thru adjustments (yes - its allowed!).

If you are genuine do yourself a favour and stop replying to this thread till after the court case

[KittyCat]

You are a person holding a LTD company who doesn't understand its finances.

http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...ml#post1438131

The case is in the business name - its not;

'person holding a LTD company' v AN Other!

[northernladuk]

The case is in the business name - its not;

'person holding a LTD company' v AN Other!

You missing the point so NVM.

[d000hg]

KC _you_ are not a business. The whole POINT of a Ltd is it separates the company entity from yourself. that's why you have to take salary/dividends, not just treat the business account as your own personal money.

[Wanderer]

KC _you_ are not a business. The whole POINT of a Ltd is it separates the company entity from yourself. that's why you have to take salary/dividends, not just treat the business account as your own personal money.

KC did point out that the action was started by the LTD company not herself personally so I think that point is well understood.....

[dave the contractor]

who? how much?

So which is the agency and who is the client?

And what is the total amount you are claiming for in the court case?