Originally posted by Buzby
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Round 2 (Court of Appeal)
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Originally posted by ContractIn View PostAnyone know what this one relates to? I see mummery is covering this as well.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostIt involves a tax avoidance scheme.Comment
-
I wonder what the longest ever amount of time was between a CoA hearing and the ruling being announced...
Myabe the doddery old judges just forgot about it.Comment
-
Originally posted by TheBarCapBoyz View PostI wonder what the longest ever amount of time was between a CoA hearing and the ruling being announced...
Myabe the doddery old judges just forgot about it.
Maybe I'm grasping at straws, but I see a long delay as at least a sign that we are getting our argument considered properly for the first time. I know the PwC case is obviously adding to the delay, but the difference in the timescales between the JR and the COA must indicate that this is just not as clear cut as Parker believed.Comment
-
Originally posted by OnYourBikeGB View PostI think even Leonardo would have been rightly stressed out by now. I'm still hoping it's a good sign. The way I look at it, the length of time favours neither side or favours us. I can't think of a circumstance where a prolonged period of consideration could solely be of benefit to Hector. If it was clear cut, then it would be over with. If the timescale is an indication of the complexity, then that's contrary to Parker who wasted no time, the best Hector can hope for is that after re-examining Parker's ruling, the judges will come down on their side after a very protracted examination of the rights or wrongs.
Maybe I'm grasping at straws, but I see a long delay as at least a sign that we are getting our argument considered properly for the first time. I know the PwC case is obviously adding to the delay, but the difference in the timescales between the JR and the COA must indicate that this is just not as clear cut as Parker believed.
I hope so - however we obviously care a great deal about this - I wonder if the judges do - possibly just one on a long list of things they have to do..Comment
-
Originally posted by OnYourBikeGB View PostI think even Leonardo would have been rightly stressed out by now. I'm still hoping it's a good sign. The way I look at it, the length of time favours neither side or favours us. I can't think of a circumstance where a prolonged period of consideration could solely be of benefit to Hector. If it was clear cut, then it would be over with. If the timescale is an indication of the complexity, then that's contrary to Parker who wasted no time, the best Hector can hope for is that after re-examining Parker's ruling, the judges will come down on their side after a very protracted examination of the rights or wrongs.
Maybe I'm grasping at straws, but I see a long delay as at least a sign that we are getting our argument considered properly for the first time. I know the PwC case is obviously adding to the delay, but the difference in the timescales between the JR and the COA must indicate that this is just not as clear cut as Parker believed.
If they felt that it should be an HMRC win, maybe they're just trying to work out how they can 'cap' the ruling so that it doesn't open the floodgates of retrospection for everyone/everything.
To me, our case was always pretty straightforward, so I can't understand why it's taking them so long.Comment
-
i still wonder if its somehow linked to the budget.
The office of tax simplification have put forward their recommendation for son of IR35 and are expecting to announce it just prior to the budget. Maybe they are also considering our case...or maybe the judges are just very busy.Comment
-
Originally posted by smalldog View Posti still wonder if its somehow linked to the budget.
The office of tax simplification have put forward their recommendation for son of IR35 and are expecting to announce it just prior to the budget. Maybe they are also considering our case...or maybe the judges are just very busy.
http://www.pcg.org.uk/cms/documents/...m%20report.pdf
Highlights:
1) Scrap IR35
2) Merge income tax and national insurance (thus raising the headline rate of tax by about 10 percentage points (can't see the politicians going for that somehow))
3) Tax dividends and savings interest as if they are salary (another vote winner)Comment
-
Originally posted by Morlock View PostThe OTS have published this morning:
http://www.pcg.org.uk/cms/documents/...m%20report.pdf
Highlights:
1) Scrap IR35
2) Merge income tax and national insurance (thus raising the headline rate of tax by about 10 percentage points (can't see the politicians going for that somehow))
3) Tax dividends and savings interest as if they are salary (another vote winner)
So by simplification they mean give us more of your money and this is simpler because you always pay more no matter how you conduct your business.
Sounds like IR35 gives way to forced PAYE
Not really scrapping IR35 but making IR35 what they wanted it to be in the first place.
Clarification you might say....Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment