Originally posted by screwthis
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Round 2 (Court of Appeal)
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Ignorant Hypocrite !
Been browsing and just read this article again: <snip>
See the comment from the guy in Swindon . So many things wrong with what he says... Need to try and rise above it I guess and hope for a good outcome on Monday.
Good luck all.Comment
-
Agreed
Originally posted by TalkingCheese View Post... Need to try and rise above it I guess and hope for a good outcome on Monday....Comment
-
Originally posted by TalkingCheese View PostSee the comment from the guy in Swindon .
Maybe one day HMRC will pay him a visit and decide they don't like the way he's been running his affairs "as efficiently as possible" for the past 15 years.Comment
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostNope! No updated SA recieved by me!Comment
-
Originally posted by TalkingCheese View PostBeen browsing and just read this article again: <snip>
See the comment from the guy in Swindon . So many things wrong with what he says... Need to try and rise above it I guess and hope for a good outcome on Monday.
Good luck all.
While I don't agree with the idea of using an offshore company (I personally would never have taken the risk) the idea of HMRC retrospectively going after those how did was against both the law and the principle of the law.
I do really hope you win.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Not been involved with BN66 but have been following the case for two years.
Best of luck to all BN66ers...Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostMontpelier have agreed to provide me with a statement on Monday, after the hearing is handed down, to post on the forum.
Obviously the primary concern is what happens next if the judges rule against us and PwC.Comment
-
Originally posted by TalkingCheese View PostBeen browsing and just read this article again: <snip>
See the comment from the guy in Swindon . So many things wrong with what he says... Need to try and rise above it I guess and hope for a good outcome on Monday.
Good luck all.Comment
-
Originally posted by robinhood View PostSeems quick to provide a statement - or do the relevant parties already know the result ?
They are sworn to secrecy and it would be contempt of court if they were to divulge anything.Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- ‘Why Should We Hire You?’ How to answer as an IT contractor Today 09:30
- Even IT contractors connect with 'New Year, New Job.' But… Yesterday 09:28
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
Comment