Originally posted by Morlock
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Round 2 (Court of Appeal)
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Originally posted by johnnyguitar View PostWhilst the long delay could mean that they are considering it properly (or could just be busy with something else?), I'm also a bit worried.
If they felt that it should be an HMRC win, maybe they're just trying to work out how they can 'cap' the ruling so that it doesn't open the floodgates of retrospection for everyone/everything.
To me, our case was always pretty straightforward, so I can't understand why it's taking them so long.
You should be reassured that your case is taking this long in delivering a judgement. It clearly demonstrates they are deliberating about something. If it was open and shut then they would have passed judgement long before this."I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith
On them! On them! They fail!Comment
-
OTS article
this is an interesting snippet from the OTS article:
The need for certainty
4.6 The OTS has spent some time probing small businesses and their advisers for what really
does lie underneath these strongly-expressed concerns. The key issue can be summarised as: certainty. What is needed are changes to the way the tax system is administered so that it will deliver certainty to businesses; certainty that their tax affairs are clear and accepted and they can move on and concentrate on doing business. This needs to be balanced with HMRC’s legitimate need, which our commentators accept and support, to police the tax system.
4.7 A specific example of the increasing lack of certainty is the way that the rules on ‘discovery’ are extending. HMRC’s assertions, increasingly supported by case law, are extending the boundaries of discovery considerably. The consequence is that the certainty offered in the principles of self assessment is being erodedComment
-
Personally I wouldn't be suprised if we have to wait several more months.
In the 'Mayes v. HMRC' case, referred to earlier, it has already been 8 months since the hearing with no sign of a judgment.
I would hope that we might get it before the courts break for summer recess at the end of July, which would be 9 months after the hearing.
However, it is not totally unheard of for cases to take more than a year.
Perhaps we might get a decision by Xmas.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostPersonally I wouldn't be suprised if we have to wait several more months.
In the 'Mayes v. HMRC' case, referred to earlier, it has already been 8 months since the hearing with no sign of a judgment.
I would hope that we might get it before the courts break for summer recess at the end of July, which would be 9 months after the hearing.
However, it is not totally unheard of for cases to take more than a year.
Perhaps we might get a decision by Xmas.Comment
-
Originally posted by robinhood View PostDoesn't worry me in the slightest - the longer it goes on for the more time i get waiting for my AIM oil stocks to go through the roof and clear the debt. Not doing too badly so far but some way to go !
The exceptional gains that are necessary to make such a strategy even a remote possibility perfectly frames the plight that HMRC have dealt to the majority of us with the disproportionate, inappropriate and flagrantly unfair legislation that is S58 FA2008. It would be right and fair for the perpetrators of the legislation to understand personally the stress and suffering that they are causing.Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
"Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECDComment
-
Originally posted by Emigre View PostI'm just picturing the excitement every time you get a valuation on your stocks and then balancing it with the complete dejection if you had to hand over all the gains to HMRC not forgetting of course that you would likely have a CGT liability to pay as well. Congratulations on doing something about it; I suspect the majority of people have simply taken a look at the numbers and thought far too big to sort out.
The exceptional gains that are necessary to make such a strategy even a remote possibility perfectly frames the plight that HMRC have dealt to the majority of us with the disproportionate, inappropriate and flagrantly unfair legislation that is S58 FA2008. It would be right and fair for the perpetrators of the legislation to understand personally the stress and suffering that they are causing.
It isn't though quite such a remote possibility as you might think - there are numerous recent examples of where such a strategy can work. GKP was around 8p in 2009 and hit £1.90 earlier in the year, Caza only last year was around 3p and now 50p. You need to do a fair amount of research and luck but has to be a better option than sticking it in a building society and it is a lot more exciting !Last edited by robinhood; 11 March 2011, 09:19.Comment
-
Originally posted by Emigre View PostI'm just picturing the excitement every time you get a valuation on your stocks and then balancing it with the complete dejection if you had to hand over all the gains to HMRC not forgetting of course that you would likely have a CGT liability to pay as well. Congratulations on doing something about it; I suspect the majority of people have simply taken a look at the numbers and thought far too big to sort out.
The exceptional gains that are necessary to make such a strategy even a remote possibility perfectly frames the plight that HMRC have dealt to the majority of us with the disproportionate, inappropriate and flagrantly unfair legislation that is S58 FA2008. It would be right and fair for the perpetrators of the legislation to understand personally the stress and suffering that they are causing.MUTS likes it HotComment
-
Originally posted by robinhood View PostAgree that it is high risk but pretty much the only way I have a hope of reaching my target in the timeframe allowed !
It isn't though quite a such remote possibility as you might think - there are numerous recent examples of where such a strategy can work. GKP was around 8p in 2009 and hit £1.90 earlier in the year, Caza only last year was around 3p and now 50p. You need to do a fair amount of research and luck but has to be a better option than sticking it in a building society and it is a lot more exciting !
In a perverse way, HMRC have probably actually done me a favour longer term in that they've forced me to be far more adventurous with savings than I used to be. Fortune favours the brave as they say!
I know this is a bit off topic but, out of curiosity, do you have a plan for cutting losses in these stocks or are they 'all or nothing bets'? Do you have a plan for taking profits?Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostI'm with you 100% on this.
In a perverse way, HMRC have probably actually done me a favour longer term in that they've forced me to be far more adventurous with savings than I used to be. Fortune favours the brave as they say!
I know this is a bit off topic but, out of curiosity, do you have a plan for cutting losses in these stocks or are they 'all or nothing bets'? Do you have a plan for taking profits?
Coincidently todays Investors Chronicle list 7 oilys they reckon are set for the big time. Luckily i have 2 of those already !Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- ‘Why Should We Hire You?’ How to answer as an IT contractor Today 09:30
- Even IT contractors connect with 'New Year, New Job.' But… Yesterday 09:28
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
Comment