Originally posted by Morlock
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
 - Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
 
BN66 - Round 2 (Court of Appeal)
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	This topic is closed.
				
				
				
				X
X
					Collapse
				
				
				
					
					
						
						
					
					
						
							
						
					
				
				
				
								
								
								Topic is closed
								
							
						
						
					
					
					
					
				- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Errr - number 3 looks a bit ominous. Is that not the same as saying, "**** you. We recognise you are a small business taking risks etc etc, but just give us the money anyway". - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
The Court of Appeal judges that heard your case are not simply deliberating on your judgement. They still continue to hear other appeals. Typically a member of the Court of Appeal will have at least one day a week allotted for reading case papers or judgment writing, the rest of his time is then taken up in Court or with other judicial functions.Originally posted by johnnyguitar View PostWhilst the long delay could mean that they are considering it properly (or could just be busy with something else?), I'm also a bit worried.
If they felt that it should be an HMRC win, maybe they're just trying to work out how they can 'cap' the ruling so that it doesn't open the floodgates of retrospection for everyone/everything.
To me, our case was always pretty straightforward, so I can't understand why it's taking them so long.
You should be reassured that your case is taking this long in delivering a judgement. It clearly demonstrates they are deliberating about something. If it was open and shut then they would have passed judgement long before this."I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith
On them! On them! They fail!Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
OTS article
this is an interesting snippet from the OTS article:
The need for certainty
4.6 The OTS has spent some time probing small businesses and their advisers for what really
does lie underneath these strongly-expressed concerns. The key issue can be summarised as: certainty. What is needed are changes to the way the tax system is administered so that it will deliver certainty to businesses; certainty that their tax affairs are clear and accepted and they can move on and concentrate on doing business. This needs to be balanced with HMRC’s legitimate need, which our commentators accept and support, to police the tax system.
4.7 A specific example of the increasing lack of certainty is the way that the rules on ‘discovery’ are extending. HMRC’s assertions, increasingly supported by case law, are extending the boundaries of discovery considerably. The consequence is that the certainty offered in the principles of self assessment is being erodedComment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Personally I wouldn't be suprised if we have to wait several more months.
In the 'Mayes v. HMRC' case, referred to earlier, it has already been 8 months since the hearing with no sign of a judgment.
I would hope that we might get it before the courts break for summer recess at the end of July, which would be 9 months after the hearing.
However, it is not totally unheard of for cases to take more than a year.
Perhaps we might get a decision by Xmas.
							
						Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Doesn't worry me in the slightest - the longer it goes on for the more time i get waiting for my AIM oil stocks to go through the roof and clear the debt. Not doing too badly so far but some way to go !Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostPersonally I wouldn't be suprised if we have to wait several more months.
In the 'Mayes v. HMRC' case, referred to earlier, it has already been 8 months since the hearing with no sign of a judgment.
I would hope that we might get it before the courts break for summer recess at the end of July, which would be 9 months after the hearing.
However, it is not totally unheard of for cases to take more than a year.
Perhaps we might get a decision by Xmas.
Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
I'm just picturing the excitement every time you get a valuation on your stocks and then balancing it with the complete dejection if you had to hand over all the gains to HMRC not forgetting of course that you would likely have a CGT liability to pay as well. Congratulations on doing something about it; I suspect the majority of people have simply taken a look at the numbers and thought far too big to sort out.Originally posted by robinhood View PostDoesn't worry me in the slightest - the longer it goes on for the more time i get waiting for my AIM oil stocks to go through the roof and clear the debt. Not doing too badly so far but some way to go !
The exceptional gains that are necessary to make such a strategy even a remote possibility perfectly frames the plight that HMRC have dealt to the majority of us with the disproportionate, inappropriate and flagrantly unfair legislation that is S58 FA2008. It would be right and fair for the perpetrators of the legislation to understand personally the stress and suffering that they are causing.Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
"Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECDComment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Agree that it is high risk but pretty much the only way I have of reaching my target in the timeframe allowed !Originally posted by Emigre View PostI'm just picturing the excitement every time you get a valuation on your stocks and then balancing it with the complete dejection if you had to hand over all the gains to HMRC not forgetting of course that you would likely have a CGT liability to pay as well. Congratulations on doing something about it; I suspect the majority of people have simply taken a look at the numbers and thought far too big to sort out.
The exceptional gains that are necessary to make such a strategy even a remote possibility perfectly frames the plight that HMRC have dealt to the majority of us with the disproportionate, inappropriate and flagrantly unfair legislation that is S58 FA2008. It would be right and fair for the perpetrators of the legislation to understand personally the stress and suffering that they are causing.
It isn't though quite such a remote possibility as you might think - there are numerous recent examples of where such a strategy can work. GKP was around 8p in 2009 and hit £1.90 earlier in the year, Caza only last year was around 3p and now 50p. You need to do a fair amount of research and luck but has to be a better option than sticking it in a building society and it is a lot more exciting !Last edited by robinhood; 11 March 2011, 09:19.Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Emigre... I agree with your statement.. But... just think about the perpetrators we are dealing with here.. 'Low life’s' is to kind of description for them... objects (deliberate exemption from using the word people) that are working towards an appraisal or bonus (sad isn’t it); they don’t give a squat about us. Don’t forget we have done nothing wrong.. We have used arrangements that were available at the time.Originally posted by Emigre View PostI'm just picturing the excitement every time you get a valuation on your stocks and then balancing it with the complete dejection if you had to hand over all the gains to HMRC not forgetting of course that you would likely have a CGT liability to pay as well. Congratulations on doing something about it; I suspect the majority of people have simply taken a look at the numbers and thought far too big to sort out.
The exceptional gains that are necessary to make such a strategy even a remote possibility perfectly frames the plight that HMRC have dealt to the majority of us with the disproportionate, inappropriate and flagrantly unfair legislation that is S58 FA2008. It would be right and fair for the perpetrators of the legislation to understand personally the stress and suffering that they are causing.
							
						MUTS likes it HotComment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
I'm with you 100% on this.Originally posted by robinhood View PostAgree that it is high risk but pretty much the only way I have a hope of reaching my target in the timeframe allowed !
It isn't though quite a such remote possibility as you might think - there are numerous recent examples of where such a strategy can work. GKP was around 8p in 2009 and hit £1.90 earlier in the year, Caza only last year was around 3p and now 50p. You need to do a fair amount of research and luck but has to be a better option than sticking it in a building society and it is a lot more exciting !
In a perverse way, HMRC have probably actually done me a favour longer term in that they've forced me to be far more adventurous with savings than I used to be. Fortune favours the brave as they say!
I know this is a bit off topic but, out of curiosity, do you have a plan for cutting losses in these stocks or are they 'all or nothing bets'? Do you have a plan for taking profits?Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
They are pretty much all or nothing. Patience is the key as I learnt last year when getting nervous and deciding to sell all of one particular oily at 6p. Now they are 20p. I'm up so far 35% but longway to go !Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostI'm with you 100% on this.
In a perverse way, HMRC have probably actually done me a favour longer term in that they've forced me to be far more adventurous with savings than I used to be. Fortune favours the brave as they say!
I know this is a bit off topic but, out of curiosity, do you have a plan for cutting losses in these stocks or are they 'all or nothing bets'? Do you have a plan for taking profits?
Coincidently todays Investors Chronicle list 7 oilys they reckon are set for the big time. Luckily i have 2 of those already !Comment
 
								
								
								Topic is closed
								
							
						
					
					
					
				- Home
 - News & Features
 - First Timers
 - IR35 / S660 / BN66
 - Employee Benefit Trusts
 - Agency Workers Regulations
 - MSC Legislation
 - Limited Companies
 - Dividends
 - Umbrella Company
 - VAT / Flat Rate VAT
 - Job News & Guides
 - Money News & Guides
 - Guide to Contracts
 - Successful Contracting
 - Contracting Overseas
 - Contractor Calculators
 - MVL
 - Contractor Expenses
 
Advertisers

				
				
				
				
Comment