• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BN66 - Time to fight back (Chapter 3)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by SantaClaus View Post
    Yep, dont forget we need a report of what was discussed at your coffee meeting under the terms of the terrorism act.
    Well - obviously - "1 latte and 1 cappucino please" is just a code.

    Comment


      a quick delurk and thank you.

      Hi

      I’m de-lurking after monitoring this thread since it started – after a fellow MP scheme member pointed it out to me.

      I must admit that prior to reading this thread I thought the writing was on the wall and it was only a matter of time before I’d have to bend over for the IR.

      So a BIG thank-you to all that have posted to date – you certainly are giving me a lot more confidence that MP are on top of the situation.

      I was with MP for just 9 months during 05/06. I pulled out at the end of the 05/06 tax year once I got wind that members of the scheme where coming under investigation.

      To date I have received all the correspondence from the IR but no closure notice as yet.

      Whilst my liability is not a life-changing amount - it’s still a substantial amount of money which will wipe out the majority of my savings – not good under the current financial climate.

      Out of interest I know of 3 other MP scheme members, one has a years liability, another has 3 years liability both have not received a CN as yet. The other has been with MP since 05 and that individual isn’t even under investigation by the IR.

      Thanks again to all prior posters!!

      Comment


        Originally posted by CanPayButWouldRatherNot View Post
        I too had one of these.

        Scanned it in and sent it on to nw et al ...hope they got it ok .....don't want to be a pest and ask if they recieved it ...

        ...should I post a copy just to be on the safe side ? ...

        your indecisively

        CPBWRN.
        Interesting chat we had at the coffe machine 5 minutes ago : I would have invited the rest of you but security a bit tight at clientco!
        Last edited by BrilloPad; 11 December 2008, 12:36.

        Comment


          "coffee"
          Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
          I will try to find out for you. BTW interesting chat we had at the coffe machine 5 minutes ago : I would have invited the rest of you but security a bit tight at clientco!
          Thanks for your help with NW and team....you da man.

          Big up to the MTM massive (etc) through this nightmare of the revenue's making.

          Comment


            I have received a letter or acknowledgment from my appeal which says I have nothing currenlty to pay for 2002-2005.

            Since then I have received letters charging me surcharges on my 2005 return after it was suspended.

            I have also received a surcharge for 2007 which is after I left the scheme and this way all paid on time!

            I have just checked on the online SA site and it shows me as still owing them over 20K! This is made up of interest charges, surcharges and unpaid tax.

            Now I'm pretty sure after they received my appeal my balance should have gone back to £0!

            The name of my case worker is "Mrs ******"!
            Last edited by harrinp1; 11 December 2008, 13:01.

            Comment


              Human Rights Advisor

              I see the Government's own Human Rights advisor has resigned. He said he felt tethered by the government, and described its record on human rights as "dismal and deeply disappointing".

              He's a lawyer. Since he is now unemployed perhaps he would like to act on our behalf?

              http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...r-gordon-brown
              Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
              "Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD

              Comment


                Originally posted by harrinp1 View Post

                The name of my case worker is "Mrs *****"!

                I recommend editing/deleting the name
                Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
                "Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Emigre View Post
                  I recommend editing/deleting the name
                  Done, but it does have comedy value :-)

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by harrinp1 View Post
                    Done, but it does have comedy value :-)

                    You're right, I enjoyed it
                    Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
                    "Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by SleepingFireman View Post
                      Hi

                      I’m de-lurking after monitoring this thread since it started – after a fellow MP scheme member pointed it out to me.

                      I must admit that prior to reading this thread I thought the writing was on the wall and it was only a matter of time before I’d have to bend over for the IR.

                      So a BIG thank-you to all that have posted to date – you certainly are giving me a lot more confidence that MP are on top of the situation.

                      I was with MP for just 9 months during 05/06. I pulled out at the end of the 05/06 tax year once I got wind that members of the scheme where coming under investigation.

                      To date I have received all the correspondence from the IR but no closure notice as yet.

                      Whilst my liability is not a life-changing amount - it’s still a substantial amount of money which will wipe out the majority of my savings – not good under the current financial climate.

                      Out of interest I know of 3 other MP scheme members, one has a years liability, another has 3 years liability both have not received a CN as yet. The other has been with MP since 05 and that individual isn’t even under investigation by the IR.

                      Thanks again to all prior posters!!


                      Many thanks for de-lurking and a very clear opening post.

                      Have you given the other 3 scheme members a link to this thread?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X