Originally posted by psychocandy
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Sacked Today
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
-
I think you mean employer, or were you a disguised contractor?Originally posted by northernladuk View PostMy last perm client tried to do that and I got 30% more with no effort at all. Its blatantly wrong and a decent lawyer will rip them a new one.Comment
-
Why are people telling the OP to move on?
Cntxy81, you need to get legal advice as you have rights here.
It sounds like the employer are trying it on by saying that you resigned 3 months previous and are giving you 3 months pay as a redundancy in the hope that you'll accept that as tax free whereas the 3 months pay in lieu would be taxable.
From what you've said (though we're only hearing one side of things) its very likely they've broken all sorts of redundancy rules here (eg, verbal and written warnings, redundancy pay as well as notice period pay, following due process) but the actual rules will depend whether they're claiming a level of misconduct.
Did you get in writing their reason for dismissal?Comment
-
Wondering why the OP hasn't responded, I suspect he'd post elsewhere too.
A single google search tells me he wasn't happy with the answers he got and went elsewhere. I might post over there on their thoughts on IR35.
https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/employm...1-Sacked-todayComment
-
I would assume if they've posted on mumsnet then it's a she. Either that or they have bigger cojones than me as I wouldn't dare.Originally posted by Paralytic View PostWondering why the OP hasn't responded, I suspect he'd post elsewhere too.
A single google search tells me he wasn't happy with the answers he got and went elsewhere. I might post over there on their thoughts on IR35.
Sacked today | Mumsnet
Shame they didn't come back. Looking at the term sales targets I am assuming this isn't a highly skilled role so if it's the energy sales type people they hire and fire regularly with little regard for the law which is why they think they can get away with it.
If I'm anywhere close the the fact the OP has disputed the targets will be why they've gone. Not pleasant environments to work in those sales roles.
Anyway, plenty of internet hugs will be given over there so guess this thread is done.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Thanks. I do search to check for cross posting, but I guess we're first in alphabetical order. Poster banned.Originally posted by Paralytic View PostWondering why the OP hasn't responded, I suspect he'd post elsewhere too.
A single google search tells me he wasn't happy with the answers he got and went elsewhere. I might post over there on their thoughts on IR35.
Sacked today | MumsnetDown with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Yesterday 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment